Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28883517›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Nab-Paclitaxel in combination with Cisplatin Versus Docetaxel Plus Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer.

Yi Chen, Jinyu Li, Shixue Chen, Yibao Zhang, Yi Hu, Guoqing Zhang, Xiang Yan, Shunchang Jiao

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yi ChenSchool of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
Jinyu LiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shixue ChenDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yibao ZhangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Department of Radiotherapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Yi HuDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Guoqing ZhangDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiang YanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Shunchang JiaoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China. jiaosc_301pla@163.com.ORCID 0000-0002-0910-4223
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNPeking University · CNTsinghua University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Albumin-bound paclitaxel (nab-PC) and docetaxel both produced favorable efficacy and safety as first-line therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the comparison between nab-PC and docetaxel remained unclear until now. This retrospective study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of nab-PC/cisplatin with docetaxel/cisplatin as first-line therapy in advanced NSCLC. 271 patients with advanced NSCLC, who received either nab-PC (55 patients) or docetaxel (216 patients) were reviewed from 2012 to 2016. The primary endpoint was objective overall response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints were disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety profiles. Nab-PC presented a significantly higher ORR than docetaxel (47.3% vs 31.9%; P = 0.033). The difference of ORR was more significantly remarkable in patients with squamous histology (58.3% vs 29.0%; P = 0.007). Additionally, the DCR of nab-PC was significantly higher than docetaxel. Patients in nab-PC group had a trend toward improved PFS and OS compared with patients in docetaxel group, but this didn't reach statistical significance. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was less in nab-PC group, while Grade ≥ 3 anemia and thrombocytopenia were less in docetaxel group. Nab-PC/cisplatin as first-line therapy, produced significantly higher efficacy and reduced neutropenia than docetaxel/cisplatin in advanced NSCLC.

Indexed as

AgedAlbuminsAnemiaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungCisplatinDocetaxelFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeutropeniaPaclitaxelRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsCisplatinDocetaxelPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID28883517
PMCPMC5589896
OpenAlexW2750607569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.