Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28883432›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Quantitative Phosphoproteomic Analysis Reveals Key Mechanisms of Cellular Proliferation in Liver Cancer Cells.

Bo Zhu, Quanze He, Jingjing Xiang, Fang Qi, Hao Cai, Jun Mao, Chunhua Zhang, Qin Zhang, Haibo Li, Lu Lu and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Advancing Environmental ToxicologyEnvironment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Decoding the PTM-switchboard of Notch.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular cell research · 2019
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bo ZhuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Department of Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Quanze HeCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Jingjing XiangCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Fang QiThe Second Department of Surgery, Hospital of China No. 17 Metallurgical Constrution Corp, Maanshan, 243000, Anhui, P.R. China.
Hao CaiState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Department of Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China.
Jun MaoCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Chunhua ZhangCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Qin ZhangCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Haibo LiCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Lu LuCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China.
Ting WangCenter for Reproduction and Genetics, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China. biowt@163.com.
Wenbo YuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, Department of Genetics, School of Life Sciences, Fudan University, Shanghai, P.R. China. wenboyu@fudan.edu.cn.
Suzhou Municipal Hospital · CNFudan University · CNMetallurgical Corporation of China (China) · CNState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms of uncontrolled proliferation in cancer cells provides valuable insights into tumor development and is benefit for discovering efficient methods in cancer treatment. In this study, we identified and quantified 2,057 phosphoproteins and 9,824 unique phosphosites in three liver cell lines with high (QGY, Hep3B) and low (L02) proliferative potentials and disclosed the wide variations in phosphorylation sites and levels among them. We found that the number of identified phosphoproteins and phosphosites in these cells were negatively correlated with their proliferative abilities. The function analysis suggested that the aberrant phosphorylation of SR proteins and activation of MAPK pathway might be two critical factors to promote cancer cell proliferation. Meanwhile, the phosphorylation status of mini-chromosome maintenance (MCM) and nuclear pore (NPC) complexes are significantly different between cell lines with high and low proliferative potentials. Furthermore, the phosphosites targeted by kinase families of CDK, STE and HIPK in the proteins coded by cancer driver genes showed distinct profiles between caner and normal cell lines. These results present key phosphorylation networks involving in abnormal proliferation of cancer cells and uncovered potential molecular markers for estimating the proliferation ability of liver cancer cells.

Indexed as

Cell ProliferationCell Line, TumorHepatocytesHumansLiver NeoplasmsPhosphoproteinsProteomeSignal TransductionPhosphoproteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID28883432
PMCPMC5589854
OpenAlexW2753883103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.