ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2010
Bioactive Glass and Glass-Ceramic Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.
Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 209 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
209 citing papers in PubMed.
- Versatile twin layer macromolecular fibers for advanced tissue engineering applications.iScience · 2026Article
- Bioactive glass-ceramic spacer alone versus spacer augmented with ABM/P-15 in single-level ACDF: a retrospective cohort study comparison of fusion rates and clinical outcomes.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026Article
- Creating Unidirectionally Macrochanneled Zirconia Bone Scaffolds with Elongated Microporous Frameworks via Vat Photopolymerization Using Phase-Separable, Photocurable Vehicle.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bone-like Collagen Matrices Through Rapid Intrafibrillar Mineralisation.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Protein adsorption at material interface: mechanistic design framework for engineering ceramic scaffolds for bone repair applications.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Review
- From bone replacement to regeneration. A biomaterials started journey.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Biological Interactions in Rat Tibial Osteogenesis: Micro-CT, Histomorphometric, and Histological Analyses of Bioglass, Fibrin Biopolymer, and Photobiomodulation.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Multifunctional YJournal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Noncalcined Bioactive Glass/Fish Scale Gelatin Hybrids Prepared by Sol-Gel Processing for EnhancedACS omega · 2026Article
- Article
- Mussel-inspired adhesive hydrogel reprograms osteoimmune niche for robust bone regeneration in complex defects.Materials today. Bio · 2026Article
- Dynamic modelling of liver-bone axis: A microphysiological approach to hepatic osteodystrophy.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Novel 3D-Printed Biophotonic Scaffold Displaying Luminescence under Near-Infrared Light for Photopharmacological Activation and Biological Signaling Compound Release.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Bioactive glass-based core-shell nanoparticles: Multifunctional platforms for controlled drug release and biomedical applications.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- The genesis of citrated ultrathin hydroxyapatite nanorods.Science advances · 2026Article
- Smart biomaterials for cardiovascular, bone, and skin tissue engineering: mechanisms, applications, and future prospects.Journal of biological engineering · 2026Review
- Effect of Sulfated Polysaccharides and Laponite in Composite Porous Scaffolds on Osteogenesis.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Synergistic Advances in Additive Manufacturing and Surface Engineering for Polymeric Biomedical Devices.ACS polymers Au · 2025Review
- The Stress-Strain State in the Pelvis During Sit-to-Stand Transfer.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Engineering bone tissue with mRNA: from molecular design and delivery to clinical applications.Materials today (Kidlington, England) · 2025Article
149 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditionally, bioactive glasses have been used to fill and restore bone defects. More recently, this category of biomaterials has become an emerging research field for bone tissue engineering applications. Here, we review and discuss current knowledge on porous bone tissue engineering scaffolds on the basis of melt-derived bioactive silicate glass compositions and relevant composite structures. Starting with an excerpt on the history of bioactive glasses, as well as on fundamental requirements for bone tissue engineering scaffolds, a detailed overview on recent developments of bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds will be given, including a summary of common fabrication methods and a discussion on the microstructural-mechanical properties of scaffolds in relation to human bone (structure-property and structure-function relationship). In addition, ion release effects of bioactive glasses concerning osteogenic and angiogenic responses are addressed. Finally, areas of future research are highlighted in this review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.