Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28883015›Full record

ReviewDisease models & mechanisms2017

Mouse models of metastasis: progress and prospects.

Laura Gómez-Cuadrado, Natasha Tracey, Ruoyu Ma, Binzhi Qian, Valerie G Brunton

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Disease models & mechanisms, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 176 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
176citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

176 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 311 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. ADCY7 dictates N-cadherin stability to inhibit HCC metastasis.JHEP reports : innovation in hepatology · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Cancer metastasisFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

116 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laura Gómez-CuadradoEdinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK.
Natasha TraceyEdinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK.
Ruoyu MaMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Binzhi QianMRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Valerie G BruntonEdinburgh Cancer Research Centre, Institute for Genetics and Molecular Medicine, Edinburgh, EH4 2XR, UK v.brunton@ed.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-7778-8794
Edinburgh Cancer Research · GBMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 17367Medical Research Council MR/K50080X/1Medical Research Council MR/N022556/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metastasis is the spread of cancer cells from a primary tumor to distant sites within the body to establish secondary tumors. Although this is an inefficient process, the consequences are devastating as metastatic disease accounts for >90% of cancer-related deaths. The formation of metastases is the result of a series of events that allow cancer cells to escape from the primary site, survive in the lymphatic system or blood vessels, extravasate and grow at distant sites. The metastatic capacity of a tumor is determined by genetic and epigenetic changes within the cancer cells as well as contributions from cells in the tumor microenvironment. Mouse models have proven to be an important tool for unraveling the complex interactions involved in the metastatic cascade and delineating its many stages. Here, we critically appraise the strengths and weaknesses of the current mouse models and highlight the recent advances that have been made using these models in our understanding of metastasis. We also discuss the use of these models for testing potential therapies and the challenges associated with the translation of these findings into the provision of new and effective treatments for cancer patients.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsCell LineageEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionHumansMiceModels, BiologicalNeoplasm MetastasisTranslational Research, BiomedicalCancerMetastasisMouse modelsStroma

Identifiers

PMID28883015
PMCPMC5611969
OpenAlexW2751023845

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.