Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28882925›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2017

SNAP-2 EPICCS: the second Sprint National Anaesthesia Project-EPIdemiology of Critical Care after Surgery: protocol for an international observational cohort study.

S Ramani Moonesinghe, Danny J N Wong, Laura Farmer, Richard Shawyer, Paul S Myles, Steve K Harris, SNAP-2 Project team and Steering Group

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03805230 (Postoperative Vasopressor Usage), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03805230 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Postoperative Vasopressor Usage : a Prospective International Observational Study (SQUEEZE)

TypeobservationalSponsorEuropean Society of AnaesthesiologyRan2020 to 2024Enrolled25,000ConditionsSurgical Procedures, Operative, Vasopressor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

S Ramani MoonesingheDepartments of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Critical Care Medicine, UCLH NIHR Surgical Outcomes Research Centre and NIAA Health Services Research Centre, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.
Danny J N WongNIAA Health Services Research Centre, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.
Laura FarmerNIAA Health Services Research Centre, Royal College of Anaesthetists, London, UK.
Richard ShawyerPatient, UK.
Paul S MylesDepartment of Anaesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Steve K HarrisDepartment of Anaesthesia, Perioperative and Critical Care Medicine, University College Hospital, London, UK.
SNAP-2 Project team and Steering Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe admission of high-risk patients to critical care after surgery is a recommended standard of care. Nevertheless, poor compliance against this recommendation has been repeatedly demonstrated in large epidemiological studies. It is unclear whether this is due to reasons of capacity, equipoise, poor quality clinical care or because hospitals are working creatively to create capacity for augmented care on normal surgical wards. The EPIdemiology of Critical Care after Surgery study aims to address these uncertainties. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: One-week observational cohort study in the UK and Australasia. All patients undergoing inpatient (overnight stay) surgery will be included. All will have prospective data collection on risk factors, surgical procedure and postoperative outcomes including the primary outcome of morbidity (measured using the Postoperative Morbidity Survey on day 7 after surgery) and secondary outcomes including length of stay and mortality. Data will also be collected on critical care referral and admission, surgical cancellations and critical care occupancy. The epidemiology of patient characteristics, processes and outcomes will be described. Inferential techniques (multilevel multivariable regression, propensity score matching and instrumental variable analysis) will be used to evaluate the relationship between critical care admission and postoperative outcome. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received ethical approval from the National Research Ethics Service in the UK and equivalent in Australasia. The collection of patient identifiable data without prior consent has been approved by the Confidentiality Advisory Group (England and Wales) and the Public Privacy and Patient Benefit Panel (Scotland). In these countries, patient identifiable data will be used to link prospectively collected data with national registers of death and inpatient administrative data. The study findings will be disseminated using a multimedia approach with the support of our lay collaborators, to patients, public, policy-makers, clinical and academic audiences.

Indexed as

AustralasiaCritical CareData CollectionHospitalizationHumansMorbidityMultivariate AnalysisPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreProspective StudiesQuality of Health CareRegression AnalysisResearch DesignSurgical Procedures, OperativeUnited Kingdomanaestheticsepiemiologyinstrumental variable analysisperioperativesurgery

Identifiers

PMID28882925
PMCPMC5722083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.