Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28882862›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Detection of Volume-Changing Metastatic Brain Tumors on Longitudinal MRI Using a Semiautomated Algorithm Based on the Jacobian Operator Field.

O Shearkhani, A Khademi, A Eilaghi, S-P Hojjat, S P Symons, C Heyn, M Machnowska, A Chan, A Sahgal, P J Maralani

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Automatically tracking brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Current approaches to the management of brain metastases.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

O ShearkhaniFrom the Departments of Medical Imaging (O.S., S.-P.H., S.P.S., C.H., M.M., A.C., P.J.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3740-5488
A KhademiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering (A.K.), Ryerson University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4932-0385
A EilaghiMechanical Engineering Department (A.E.), Australian College of Kuwait, Kuwait City, Kuwait.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7238-8938
S-P HojjatFrom the Departments of Medical Imaging (O.S., S.-P.H., S.P.S., C.H., M.M., A.C., P.J.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0188-1578
S P SymonsFrom the Departments of Medical Imaging (O.S., S.-P.H., S.P.S., C.H., M.M., A.C., P.J.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8025-9965
C HeynFrom the Departments of Medical Imaging (O.S., S.-P.H., S.P.S., C.H., M.M., A.C., P.J.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3226-5199
M MachnowskaFrom the Departments of Medical Imaging (O.S., S.-P.H., S.P.S., C.H., M.M., A.C., P.J.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6088-5902
A ChanFrom the Departments of Medical Imaging (O.S., S.-P.H., S.P.S., C.H., M.M., A.C., P.J.M.).ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1978-2853
A SahgalRadiation Oncology (A.S.), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7991-8970
P J MaralaniFrom the Departments of Medical Imaging (O.S., S.-P.H., S.P.S., C.H., M.M., A.C., P.J.M.) pejman.maralani@sunnybrook.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9975-4379
S.P.E.C.I.E.S. · USAbbott (Sweden) · SEAustralian University, Kuwait · KWToronto Metropolitan University · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAccurate follow-up of metastatic brain tumors has important implications for patient prognosis and management. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate the accuracy of a semiautomated algorithm in detecting growing or shrinking metastatic brain tumors on longitudinal brain MRIs. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe used 50 pairs of successive MR imaging datasets, 30 on 1.5T and 20 on 3T, containing contrast-enhanced 3D T1-weighted sequences. These yielded 150 growing or shrinking metastatic brain tumors. To detect them, we completed 2 major steps: 1) spatial normalization and calculation of the Jacobian operator field to quantify changes between scans, and 2) metastatic brain tumor candidate segmentation and detection of volume-changing metastatic brain tumors with the Jacobian operator field. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the detection accuracy of the algorithm, and it was verified with jackknife resampling. The reference standard was based on detections by a neuroradiologist.

resultsThe areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.925 for 1.5T and 0.965 for 3T. Furthermore, at its optimal performance, the algorithm achieved a sensitivity of 85.1% and 92.1% and specificity of 86.7% and 91.3% for 1.5T and 3T, respectively. Vessels were responsible for most false-positives. Newly developed or resolved metastatic brain tumors were a major source of false-negatives.

conclusionsThe proposed algorithm could detect volume-changing metastatic brain tumors on longitudinal brain MRIs with statistically high accuracy, demonstrating its potential as a computer-aided change-detection tool for complementing the performance of radiologists, decreasing inter- and intraobserver variability, and improving efficacy.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsFalse Negative ReactionsFalse Positive ReactionsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedObserver VariationRetrospective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID28882862
PMCPMC7963589
OpenAlexW2753050650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.