Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28882630›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2017

Spatial gene expression analysis of neuroanatomical differences in mouse models.

Darren J Fernandes, Jacob Ellegood, Rand Askalan, Randy D Blakely, Emanuel Dicicco-Bloom, Sean E Egan, Lucy R Osborne, Craig M Powell, Armin Raznahan, Diane M Robins and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sex chromosomes and hormones independently influence healthy brain development but act similarly after cranial radiation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Developmental Mouse Brain Common Coordinate Framework.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. A diffusion MRI-based spatiotemporal continuum of the embryonic mouse brain for probing gene-neuroanatomy connections.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Darren J FernandesMouse Imaging Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. Electronic address: darren.fernandes@sickkids.ca.
Jacob EllegoodMouse Imaging Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rand AskalanDepartment of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Randy D BlakelyCharles E. Schmidt College of Medicine, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL, USA.
Emanuel Dicicco-BloomDepartment of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Sean E EganDevelopmental and Stem Cell Biology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lucy R OsborneDepartments of Medicine and Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Craig M PowellDepartments of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, Psychiatry, Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Armin RaznahanChild Psychiatry Branch, National Institutes of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Diane M RobinsDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Michael W SalterNeurosciences and Mental Health Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Physiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ameet S SengarNeurosciences and Mental Health Program, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeeleDepartment of Pharmacology, Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Nashville, TN, USA.
R M HenkelmanMouse Imaging Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jason P LerchMouse Imaging Centre, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

Section on Developmental NeurogenomicsZIAMH002949 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI RAZNAHAN, ARMIN · 2016 to 2025
$30.0M
NOVEL GENETIC MODELS OF AUTISMR01HD069560 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI POWELL, CRAIG M · 2011 to 2020
$4.8M
Neuroligin Function in vivo: Implications for Autism and Mental RetardationR01MH081164 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI POWELL, CRAIG M · 2009 to 2013
$1.9M
Striatal synaptic Abnormalities in Models of AutismR01MH093697 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI POWELL, CRAIG M · 2012 to 2015
$1.6M
Novel Genetic Animal Models of AutismR21HD065290 · NICHD · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI POWELL, CRAIG M · 2009 to 2010
$550k
CIHRNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069560NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD065290NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH081164NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH093697
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MRI is a powerful modality to detect neuroanatomical differences that result from mutations and treatments. Knowing which genes drive these differences is important in understanding etiology, but candidate genes are often difficult to identify. We tested whether spatial gene expression data from the Allen Brain Institute can be used to inform us about genes that cause neuroanatomical differences. For many single-gene-mutation mouse models, we found that affected neuroanatomy was not strongly associated with the spatial expression of the altered gene and there are specific caveats for each model. However, among models with significant neuroanatomical differences from their wildtype controls, the mutated genes had preferential spatial expression in affected neuroanatomy. In mice exposed to environmental enrichment, candidate genes could be identified by a genome-wide search for genes with preferential spatial expression in the altered neuroanatomical regions. These candidates have functions related to learning and plasticity. We demonstrate that spatial gene expression of single-genes is a poor predictor of altered neuroanatomy, but altered neuroanatomy can identify candidate genes responsible for neuroanatomical phenotypes.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainDisease Models, AnimalGenetic Association StudiesMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMutationPhenotype

Identifiers

PMID28882630
PMCPMC7097887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.