Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28882550›Full record

Trial reportWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health

Partner Relationships and Injection Sharing Practices among Rural Appalachian Women.

Michele Staton, Justin C Strickland, Martha Tillson, Carl Leukefeld, J Matthew Webster, Carrie B Oser

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Association of Injection Practices and Overdose With Drug Use Typologies: A Latent Class Analysis Among People Who Inject Drugs in Baltimore, 2017.AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Protective Factors Associated With Lower Likelihood of Injection Drug Use and Experiencing Overdose Among Incarcerated Women.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michele StatonDepartment of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky. Electronic address: mstaton@uky.edu.
Justin C StricklandDepartment of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Martha TillsonCenter on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Carl LeukefeldDepartment of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
J Matthew WebsterDepartment of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Carrie B OserDepartment of Sociology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.

Funding

Brief intervention for drug-using rural women at high-risk for HIV/HCVR01DA033866 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI STATON, MICHELE · 2012 to 2016
$2.8M
Social Networks and HIV Risk Behaviors of Special Populations of Drug UsersK02DA035116 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI OSER, CARRIE BETH · 2013 to 2017
$579k
NIDA NIH HHS K02 DA035116NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033866
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe role of relationships in initiating and maintaining women's risk behaviors has been established. However, understanding factors that may underlie partner relationships and women's risky drug use, particularly in rural contexts, is limited. This study is the first to examine the association between injecting partners and women's risky injection practices as a function of relationship power perception.

methodsFemale participants were recruited from three rural jails in the Appalachian region. Women were selected randomly, provided informed consent, and screened for study eligibility criteria. This cross-sectional analysis focuses on women who inject drugs during the year before entering jail (n = 199). MAIN

findingsApproximately three-quarters (76%) reported having a recent main male sexual partner with a history of injection drug use. Although having a risky partner independently increased the likelihood of women reporting shared injection practices, perceptions of relationship power significantly moderated the effect on shared needle (adjusted odds ratio, 0.02; 95% CI, 0.003-0.23; p = .001) and shared works (adjusted odds ratio, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.03-0.95; p = .04) use.

conclusionsThis interaction indicated that, for women who inject drugs with a recent injecting male partner, greater perception of relationship power was associated with a decreased likelihood of shared injection practices. Implications for clinical assessment and intervention are discussed.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationSexual PartnersAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMaleNeedle SharingPrisonsRisk-TakingSubstance Abuse, IntravenousSubstance-Related Disorders

Identifiers

PMID28882550
PMCPMC5701655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.