Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2017
Gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in previously untreated advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas (GeDDiS): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial.
Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 289 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Phase II Trial of Avelumab in Combination With Gemcitabine in Advanced Leiomyosarcoma as a Second-line Treatment
A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing the Activity of trabectedIn vs Gemcitabine in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Leiomyosarcoma Pretreated With Conventional Chemotherapy
Phase I/II Randomized Clinical Trial of Selinexor Plus Gemcitabine in Selected Advanced Soft-tissue Sarcomas
Who cites it
289 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 505 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnosis and Therapy of Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas (GEIS) Guidelines.Cancers · 2025Guideline
- SEOM-GEIS Spanish clinical guidelines for the management of soft‑tissue sarcomas (2024).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Guideline
- UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas.British journal of cancer · 2025Guideline
- Evaluation of the efficacy of systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis.Cancer medicine · 2023Pooled it
- Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2022Guideline
- Utidelone in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma refractory to anthracycline and antiangiogenic therapy (UTISARC): a single-arm phase II study.BMC medicine · 2026Trial
- A Single-Arm Phase 2 Trial of Doxorubicin Plus Zalifrelimab (Anti-CTLA-4 Antibody) and Balstilimab (Anti-PD-1 Antibody) in Advanced/Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025Trial
- A multicenter, randomized, non-comparative, phase II study of nivolumab ± ipilimumab for patients with metastatic sarcoma (Alliance A091401): expansion cohorts and correlative analyses.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2024Trial
- Durvalumab plus pazopanib combination in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas: a phase II trial.Nature communications · 2024Trial
- A phase II study of gemcitabine and docetaxel combination in relapsed metastatic or unresectable locally advanced synovial sarcoma.BMC cancer · 2023Trial
- Pilot study of bempegaldesleukin in combination with nivolumab in patients with metastatic sarcoma.Nature communications · 2022Trial
- AI-Radiomics Can Improve Inclusion Criteria and Clinical Trial Performance.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Advances in uterine sarcoma management: A mini-review of clinical practice and molecular insights.Gynecologic oncology reports · 2026Review
- Partially Ablative Body Radiation Therapy Versus Standard Palliative Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Bulky Unresectable Sarcomas.Advances in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Pharmacologic Resistance in Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Translational Therapeutic Strategies.Cancers · 2026Review
- Metastatic Uterine Sarcomas: A Retrospective Analysis on Clinical Outcomes and Biology.Cureus · 2026Article
- Impact of Frontline Systemic Treatment Choice on Clinical Outcome in Advanced Leiomyosarcoma: A CanSaRCC Study.Cancer medicine · 2026Observational
- Restoring STING expression in soft tissue sarcoma increases activation and function of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2026Article
229 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
19 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFor many years, first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma has been doxorubicin. This study compared gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma.
methodsThe GeDDiS trial was a randomised controlled phase 3 trial done in 24 UK hospitals and one Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) hospital. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma of Trojani grade 2 or 3, disease progression before enrolment, and no previous chemotherapy for sarcoma or previous doxorubicin for any cancer. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive six cycles of intravenous doxorubicin 75 mg/m
findingsBetween Dec 3, 2010, and Jan 20, 2014, 257 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment groups (129 to doxorubicin and 128 to gemcitabine and docetaxel). Median follow-up was 22 months (IQR 15·7-29·3). The proportion of patients alive and progression free at 24 weeks did not differ between those who received doxorubicin versus those who received gemcitabine and docetaxel (46·3% [95% CI 37·5-54·6] vs 46·4% [37·5-54·8]); median progression-free survival (23·3 weeks [95% CI 19·6-30·4] vs 23·7 weeks [18·1-20·0]; hazard ratio [HR] for progression-free survival 1·28, 95% CI 0·99-1·65, p=0·06). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia (32 [25%] of 128 patients who received doxorubicin and 25 [20%] of 126 patients who received gemcitabine and docetaxel), febrile neutropenia (26 [20%] and 15 [12%]), fatigue (eight [6%] and 17 [14%]), oral mucositis (18 [14%] and two [2%]), and pain (ten [8%] and 13 [10%]). The three most common serious adverse events, representing 111 (39%) of all 285 serious adverse events recorded, were febrile neutropenia (27 [17%] of 155 serious adverse events in patients who received doxorubicin and 15 [12%] of 130 serious adverse events in patients who received gemcitabine and docetaxel, fever (18 [12%] and 19 [15%]), and neutropenia (22 [14%] and ten [8%]). 154 (60%) of 257 patients died in the intention-to-treat population: 74 (57%) of 129 patients in the doxorubicin group and 80 (63%) of 128 in the gemcitabine and docetaxel group. No deaths were related to the treatment, but two deaths were due to a combination of disease progression and treatment.
interpretationDoxorubicin should remain the standard first-line treatment for most patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. These results provide evidence for clinicians to consider with their patients when selecting first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma.
fundingCancer Research UK, Sarcoma UK, and Clinical Trial Unit Kantonsspital St Gallen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.