Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28882536›Full record

Trial reportThe Lancet. Oncology2017

Gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment in previously untreated advanced unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas (GeDDiS): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial.

Beatrice Seddon, Sandra J Strauss, Jeremy Whelan, Michael Leahy, Penella J Woll, Fiona Cowie, Christian Rothermundt, Zoe Wood, Charlotte Benson, Nasim Ali and 9 more

3 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Lancet. Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 289 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
289citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
34.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03536780 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Phase II Trial of Avelumab in Combination With Gemcitabine in Advanced Leiomyosarcoma as a Second-line Treatment

TypeinterventionalSponsorGachon University Gil Medical CenterRan2018 to 2022Enrolled38ConditionsLeiomyosarcoma MetastaticArmsAvelumab and Gemcitabine
NCT04383119 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Phase II Trial Comparing the Activity of trabectedIn vs Gemcitabine in Patients With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Leiomyosarcoma Pretreated With Conventional Chemotherapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorItalian Sarcoma GroupRan2021 to 2026Enrolled100ConditionsLeiomyosarcoma of Ovary, Soft Tissue SarcomaArmsTrabectedin, Gemcitabine, No Intervention: Observational Cohort
NCT06114004 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Phase I/II Randomized Clinical Trial of Selinexor Plus Gemcitabine in Selected Advanced Soft-tissue Sarcomas

TypeinterventionalSponsorAsociación Europea y Latinoamericana SELNET para la Investigación en SarcomasRan2023 to 2026Enrolled88ConditionsSarcoma,Soft TissueArmsSelinexor 20 MG, Gemcitabine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

289 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 505 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. SEOM-GEIS Spanish clinical guidelines for the management of soft‑tissue sarcomas (2024).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Version 2.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2022
    Guideline
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2021
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

229 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 12 institutions in 2 countries.

Beatrice SeddonUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK. Electronic address: beatrice.seddon@uclh.nhs.uk.
Sandra J StraussUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK.
Jeremy WhelanUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Michael LeahyThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Penella J WollUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Fiona CowieBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK.
Christian RothermundtKantonsspital, St Gallen, Switzerland; Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK), Bern, Switzerland.
Zoe WoodUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Charlotte BensonThe Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nasim AliThe Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Wirral, UK.
Maria MarplesThe Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK.
Gareth J VealNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
David JamiesonNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Katja KüverNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Roberto TiraboscoRoyal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Sharon ForsythCancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
Stephen NashCancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
Hakim-Moulay DehbiCancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
Sandy BeareCancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, UK.
University College London · GBNewcastle University · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBBeatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre · GBCancer Research UK · GBClatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust · GBCRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence · GBKantonsspital St. Gallen · CHLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBRoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11561
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor many years, first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma has been doxorubicin. This study compared gemcitabine and docetaxel versus doxorubicin as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma.

methodsThe GeDDiS trial was a randomised controlled phase 3 trial done in 24 UK hospitals and one Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) hospital. Eligible patients had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma of Trojani grade 2 or 3, disease progression before enrolment, and no previous chemotherapy for sarcoma or previous doxorubicin for any cancer. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive six cycles of intravenous doxorubicin 75 mg/m

findingsBetween Dec 3, 2010, and Jan 20, 2014, 257 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the two treatment groups (129 to doxorubicin and 128 to gemcitabine and docetaxel). Median follow-up was 22 months (IQR 15·7-29·3). The proportion of patients alive and progression free at 24 weeks did not differ between those who received doxorubicin versus those who received gemcitabine and docetaxel (46·3% [95% CI 37·5-54·6] vs 46·4% [37·5-54·8]); median progression-free survival (23·3 weeks [95% CI 19·6-30·4] vs 23·7 weeks [18·1-20·0]; hazard ratio [HR] for progression-free survival 1·28, 95% CI 0·99-1·65, p=0·06). The most common grade 3 and 4 adverse events were neutropenia (32 [25%] of 128 patients who received doxorubicin and 25 [20%] of 126 patients who received gemcitabine and docetaxel), febrile neutropenia (26 [20%] and 15 [12%]), fatigue (eight [6%] and 17 [14%]), oral mucositis (18 [14%] and two [2%]), and pain (ten [8%] and 13 [10%]). The three most common serious adverse events, representing 111 (39%) of all 285 serious adverse events recorded, were febrile neutropenia (27 [17%] of 155 serious adverse events in patients who received doxorubicin and 15 [12%] of 130 serious adverse events in patients who received gemcitabine and docetaxel, fever (18 [12%] and 19 [15%]), and neutropenia (22 [14%] and ten [8%]). 154 (60%) of 257 patients died in the intention-to-treat population: 74 (57%) of 129 patients in the doxorubicin group and 80 (63%) of 128 in the gemcitabine and docetaxel group. No deaths were related to the treatment, but two deaths were due to a combination of disease progression and treatment.

interpretationDoxorubicin should remain the standard first-line treatment for most patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma. These results provide evidence for clinicians to consider with their patients when selecting first-line treatment for locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma.

fundingCancer Research UK, Sarcoma UK, and Clinical Trial Unit Kantonsspital St Gallen.

Indexed as

AdultAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsConfidence IntervalsDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelDose-Response Relationship, DrugDoxorubicinDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleGemcitabineHumansInfusions, IntravenousKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedDeoxycytidineDocetaxelDoxorubicinGemcitabineTaxoids

Identifiers

PMID28882536
PMCPMC5622179
OpenAlexW2752560124

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.