Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28882447›Full record

ArticleBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2018

Improving the Informed Consent Process in Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: Patient, Caregiver, and Provider Perspectives.

Minakshi Raj, Sung Won Choi, Tuba Suzer Gurtekin, Jodyn Platt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integrating stakeholder feedback in translational genomics research: an ethnographic analysis of a study protocol's evolution.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Minakshi RajDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Electronic address: miraj@umich.edu.
Sung Won ChoiDepartment of Pediatrics, Blood and Marrow Transplantation Program, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Tuba Suzer GurtekinSurvey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Jodyn PlattDepartment of Learning Health Sciences, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Funding

Linking Community Engagement Research to Public Health Biobank PracticeR01HD067264 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KARDIA, SHARON L · 2011 to 2015
$3.0M
Phase II Trial of Vorinostat plus Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate to Prevent GVHDK23AI091623 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CHOI, SUNG WON · 2011 to 2015
$658k
NIAID NIH HHS K23 AI091623NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD067264
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the significant modifications to the Common Rule is the requirement that prospective participants be given information sufficient for a "reasonable person." However, research is limited on what types of information patients, caregivers, and providers consider "key information." Although certain aspects of informed consent (IC) may be considered standard, considering the individualized needs and preferences of patients is necessary for patient-centered consent. In this study, we qualitatively examined the specific types of information that patients and caregivers involved in hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), as well as their providers, believe to be important and necessary as part of the IC process to make a decision about participating in clinical research; and further, how these perspectives are aligned. Our findings suggest opportunities for improving the IC document and process by emphasizing information of importance to patients, such as the benefits to others and contributions to science that are associated with participation in clinical research. Furthermore, increasing patient engagement during the IC process may allow providers to streamline information that is aligned with patient information needs and preferences.

Indexed as

Quality ImprovementAdultCaregiversDecision MakingFemaleHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansInformed ConsentMaleMiddle AgedPatient Education as TopicPatient ParticipationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultClinical researchHematopoietic cell transplantationInformed consent

Identifiers

PMID28882447
PMCPMC5743761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.