Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28882167›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Implementation and results of an integrated data quality assurance protocol in a randomized controlled trial in Uttar Pradesh, India.

Jonathon D Gass, Anamika Misra, Mahendra Nath Singh Yadav, Fatima Sana, Chetna Singh, Anup Mankar, Brandon J Neal, Jennifer Fisher-Bowman, Jenny Maisonneuve, Megan Marx Delaney and 6 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02148952 (A Matched-pair, Cluster Randomized Trial to Measure the Efficacy of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program on Severe Maternal, Fetal and Newborn Harm), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02148952 nacompletednot on this map

A Matched-pair, Cluster Randomized Trial to Measure the Efficacy of the WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program on Severe Maternal, Fetal and Newborn Harm

TypeinterventionalSponsorHarvard School of Public Health (HSPH)Ran2014 to 2017Enrolled157,689ConditionsMaternal Death, Maternal Morbidity, Stillbirth, Neonatal DeathArmsWHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Effectiveness of a WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist Coaching-based intervention on the availability of Essential Birth Supplies in Uttar Pradesh, India.International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care · 2018
    Trial
  4. Article
  5. Data Quality in Health Research: Integrative Literature Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jonathon D GassAriadne Labs of the Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. jonathon.gass@gmail.com.
Anamika MisraPopulation Services International, New Delhi, India.
Mahendra Nath Singh YadavPopulation Services International, New Delhi, India.
Fatima SanaPopulation Services International, New Delhi, India.
Chetna SinghPopulation Services International, New Delhi, India.
Anup MankarAriadne Labs of the Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Brandon J NealAriadne Labs of the Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jennifer Fisher-BowmanAriadne Labs of the Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Jenny MaisonneuveAriadne Labs of the Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Megan Marx DelaneyAriadne Labs of the Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Krishan KumarPopulation Services International, New Delhi, India.
Vinay Pratap SinghPopulation Services International, New Delhi, India.
Narender SharmaPopulation Services International, New Delhi, India.
Atul GawandeAriadne Labs of the Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Katherine SemrauAriadne Labs of the Brigham & Women's Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Lisa R HirschhornAriadne Labs, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Arthur J. Rubloff Building 420 East Superior Street, Chicago, 60611, Illinois, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are few published standards or methodological guidelines for integrating Data Quality Assurance (DQA) protocols into large-scale health systems research trials, especially in resource-limited settings. The BetterBirth Trial is a matched-pair, cluster-randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the BetterBirth Program, which seeks to improve quality of facility-based deliveries and reduce 7-day maternal and neonatal mortality and maternal morbidity in Uttar Pradesh, India. In the trial, over 6300 deliveries were observed and over 153,000 mother-baby pairs across 120 study sites were followed to assess health outcomes. We designed and implemented a robust and integrated DQA system to sustain high-quality data throughout the trial.

methodsWe designed the Data Quality Monitoring and Improvement System (DQMIS) to reinforce six dimensions of data quality: accuracy, reliability, timeliness, completeness, precision, and integrity. The DQMIS was comprised of five functional components: 1) a monitoring and evaluation team to support the system; 2) a DQA protocol, including data collection audits and targets, rapid data feedback, and supportive supervision; 3) training; 4) standard operating procedures for data collection; and 5) an electronic data collection and reporting system. Routine audits by supervisors included double data entry, simultaneous delivery observations, and review of recorded calls to patients. Data feedback reports identified errors automatically, facilitating supportive supervision through a continuous quality improvement model.

resultsThe five functional components of the DQMIS successfully reinforced data reliability, timeliness, completeness, precision, and integrity. The DQMIS also resulted in 98.33% accuracy across all data collection activities in the trial. All data collection activities demonstrated improvement in accuracy throughout implementation. Data collectors demonstrated a statistically significant (p = 0.0004) increase in accuracy throughout consecutive audits. The DQMIS was successful, despite an increase from 20 to 130 data collectors.

conclusionsIn the absence of widely disseminated data quality methods and standards for large RCT interventions in limited-resource settings, we developed an integrated DQA system, combining auditing, rapid data feedback, and supportive supervision, which ensured high-quality data and could serve as a model for future health systems research trials. Future efforts should focus on standardization of DQA processes for health systems research.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02148952 . Registered on 13 February 2014.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyParturitionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHealth Services ResearchHumansIndiaInfantInfant MortalityInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesMaternal MortalityPregnancyQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ImprovementQuality Indicators, Health CareData accuracyData feedbackData Quality Assurance (DQA)IndiaMaternal and perinatal mortalityMaternal morbidityPatient-reported outcomesRandomized control trial (RCT)Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC)Supportive supervisionUttar Pradesh

Identifiers

PMID28882167
PMCPMC5590237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.