Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28882146›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2017

Does mosquito mass-rearing produce an inferior mosquito?

Dieudonné D Soma, Hamidou Maïga, Wadaka Mamai, Nanwintoun S Bimbile-Somda, Nelius Venter, Adel B Ali, Hanano Yamada, Abdoulaye Diabaté, Florence Fournet, Georges A Ouédraogo and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evolutionary Ecology ofAnnual review of genetics · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 6 countries.

Dieudonné D SomaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Centre Muraz, BP 545, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. dieusoma@yahoo.fr.
Hamidou MaïgaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Centre Muraz, BP 545, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Wadaka MamaiInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Vienna, Austria.
Nanwintoun S Bimbile-SomdaInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Centre Muraz, BP 545, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Nelius VenterVector Control Reference Laboratory, Centre for Opportunistic, Tropical & Hospital Infections, National Institute for Communicable Diseases / Wits Research Institute for Malaria, School of Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Adel B AliInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Vienna, Austria.
Hanano YamadaInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Vienna, Austria.
Abdoulaye DiabatéInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Centre Muraz, BP 545, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Florence FournetInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), MIVEGEC, BP 64501, 34394, Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Georges A OuédraogoUniversité Nazi Boni, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Rosemary S LeesLiverpool Insect Testing Establishment (LITE), Vector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Pembroke Place, Liverpool, L3 5QA, UK.
Roch K DabiréInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé/Centre Muraz, BP 545, Bobo-Dioulasso, Burkina Faso.
Jeremie R L GillesInsect Pest Control Laboratory, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Vienna, Austria. jeremie.gilles@gmail.com.
International Atomic Energy Agency · ATInstitut de Recherche en Sciences de la Santé · BFInstitut de Recherche pour le Développement · FRLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBNazi Boni University · BFUniversity of the Witwatersrand · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe success of the sterile insect technique depends, among other things, on continuous releases of sexually competitive sterile males within the target area. Several factors (including high rearing density and physical manipulation, such as larvae and pupae separation) can influence the quality of males produced in mass-rearing facilities. The different steps in mass production in the laboratory may modify the behaviour of mosquitoes, directly or through loss of natural characters as a result of adaptation to lab rearing, and lead to the competitiveness of sterile male being reduced. In the present study, the objective was to evaluate the effect of mass-rearing conditions on sterile male sexual competitiveness in semi-field cages compared to routine small scale laboratory rearing methods.

methodsAnopheles arabiensis immature stages were reared both on a large scale using a rack and tray system developed by the FAO/IAEA (MRS), and on a small scale using standard laboratory rearing trays (SRS). Mosquito life history traits such as pupation rate, emergence rate, adult size as well as the effect of irradiation on adult longevity were evaluated. Moreover, 5-6 day old mosquitoes were released into field cages and left for two nights to mate and the mating competitiveness between sterile mass-reared males and fertile males reared on a small scale when competing for small scale reared virgin females was investigated. Resulting fertility in a treatment ratio of 1:1:1 (100 irradiated males: 100 non-irradiated males: 100 virgin females) was compared to control cages with 0:100:100 (non-irradiated control) and 100:0:100 (irradiated control).

resultsNo significant differences in life history parameters were observed between rearing methods. The competitiveness index of mass reared males (0.58) was similar to males reared on a small scale (0.59). A residual fertility rate of 20% was observed in the irradiated control (100:0:100), measured as the percentage of eggs collected from the cages which developed to adulthood. No significant difference was observed (t = 0.2896, df = 4, P = 0.7865) between the rearing treatments (MRS and SRS) in the fertility rate, a measure of mating competitiveness.

conclusionsThe results showed that the FAO/IAEA mass-rearing process did not affect mosquito life history parameters or the mating competitiveness of males.

Indexed as

BreedingAnimalsAnophelesEggsFemaleFertilityInfertilityInseminationMaleMosquito ControlSexual Behavior, AnimalSterilization, ReproductiveAnopheles arabiensisCompetitivenessMass-rearingSterile insect technique

Identifiers

PMID28882146
PMCPMC5590130
OpenAlexW2752441720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.