Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28882005›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

CATS (Coordinates of Atoms by Taylor Series): protein design with backbone flexibility in all locally feasible directions.

Mark A Hallen, Bruce R Donald

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Protocol for DesigningJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2024
    Article
  2. DexDesign: an OSPREY-based algorithm for designing de novo D-peptide inhibitors.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Minimization-Aware RecursiveJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Advances in protein structure prediction and design.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  9. Protein Design by Provable Algorithms.Communications of the ACM · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark A HallenDepartment of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
Bruce R DonaldDepartment of Computer Science, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.

Funding

Computational Structure-Based Protein DesignR01GM078031 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI DONALD, BRUCE R. · 2008 to 2021
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationWhen proteins mutate or bind to ligands, their backbones often move significantly, especially in loop regions. Computational protein design algorithms must model these motions in order to accurately optimize protein stability and binding affinity. However, methods for backbone conformational search in design have been much more limited than for sidechain conformational search. This is especially true for combinatorial protein design algorithms, which aim to search a large sequence space efficiently and thus cannot rely on temporal simulation of each candidate sequence.

resultsWe alleviate this difficulty with a new parameterization of backbone conformational space, which represents all degrees of freedom of a specified segment of protein chain that maintain valid bonding geometry (by maintaining the original bond lengths and angles and ω dihedrals). In order to search this space, we present an efficient algorithm, CATS, for computing atomic coordinates as a function of our new continuous backbone internal coordinates. CATS generalizes the iMinDEE and EPIC protein design algorithms, which model continuous flexibility in sidechain dihedrals, to model continuous, appropriately localized flexibility in the backbone dihedrals ϕ and ψ as well. We show using 81 test cases based on 29 different protein structures that CATS finds sequences and conformations that are significantly lower in energy than methods with less or no backbone flexibility do. In particular, we show that CATS can model the viability of an antibody mutation known experimentally to increase affinity, but that appears sterically infeasible when modeled with less or no backbone flexibility. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our code is available as free software at https://github.com/donaldlab/OSPREY_refactor . CONTACT: mhallen@ttic.edu or brd+ismb17@cs.duke.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Indexed as

SoftwareAlgorithmsComputational BiologyModels, MolecularMutationProtein ConformationProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID28882005
PMCPMC5870559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.