ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017
CATS (Coordinates of Atoms by Taylor Series): protein design with backbone flexibility in all locally feasible directions.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Protocol for DesigningJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2024Article
- DexDesign: an OSPREY-based algorithm for designing de novo D-peptide inhibitors.Protein engineering, design & selection : PEDS · 2024Article
- Design of peptides with high affinity binding to a monoclonal antibody as a basis for immunotherapy.Peptides · 2021Article
- Novel, provable algorithms for efficient ensemble-based computational protein design and their application to the redesign of the c-Raf-RBD:KRas protein-protein interface.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Dynamics, a Powerful Component of Current and Future in Silico Approaches for Protein Design and Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Minimization-Aware RecursiveJournal of computational biology : a journal of computational molecular cell biology · 2020Article
- Computational Analysis of Energy Landscapes Reveals Dynamic Features That Contribute to Binding of Inhibitors to CFTR-Associated Ligand.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2019Article
- Advances in protein structure prediction and design.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019Review
- Protein Design by Provable Algorithms.Communications of the ACM · 2019Article
- OSPREY 3.0: Open-source protein redesign for you, with powerful new features.Journal of computational chemistry · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationWhen proteins mutate or bind to ligands, their backbones often move significantly, especially in loop regions. Computational protein design algorithms must model these motions in order to accurately optimize protein stability and binding affinity. However, methods for backbone conformational search in design have been much more limited than for sidechain conformational search. This is especially true for combinatorial protein design algorithms, which aim to search a large sequence space efficiently and thus cannot rely on temporal simulation of each candidate sequence.
resultsWe alleviate this difficulty with a new parameterization of backbone conformational space, which represents all degrees of freedom of a specified segment of protein chain that maintain valid bonding geometry (by maintaining the original bond lengths and angles and ω dihedrals). In order to search this space, we present an efficient algorithm, CATS, for computing atomic coordinates as a function of our new continuous backbone internal coordinates. CATS generalizes the iMinDEE and EPIC protein design algorithms, which model continuous flexibility in sidechain dihedrals, to model continuous, appropriately localized flexibility in the backbone dihedrals ϕ and ψ as well. We show using 81 test cases based on 29 different protein structures that CATS finds sequences and conformations that are significantly lower in energy than methods with less or no backbone flexibility do. In particular, we show that CATS can model the viability of an antibody mutation known experimentally to increase affinity, but that appears sterically infeasible when modeled with less or no backbone flexibility. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Our code is available as free software at https://github.com/donaldlab/OSPREY_refactor . CONTACT: mhallen@ttic.edu or brd+ismb17@cs.duke.edu. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.