Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28881966›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

DextMP: deep dive into text for predicting moonlighting proteins.

Ishita K Khan, Mansurul Bhuiyan, Daisuke Kihara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predictive modeling of moonlighting DNA-binding proteins.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022
    Article
  5. Moonlighting in Rickettsiales: Expanding Virulence Landscape.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Moonlighting Proteins Shine New Light on Molecular Signaling Niches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. Frontiers in genetics · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Spatial proteomics: a powerful discovery tool for cell biology.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ishita K KhanDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Mansurul BhuiyanDepartment of Computer Science, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Daisuke KiharaDepartment of Computer Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

Funding

Identification of protein-metabolite interactome.R01GM097528 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI KIHARA, DAISUKE · 2011 to 2014
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM097528
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationMoonlighting proteins (MPs) are an important class of proteins that perform more than one independent cellular function. MPs are gaining more attention in recent years as they are found to play important roles in various systems including disease developments. MPs also have a significant impact in computational function prediction and annotation in databases. Currently MPs are not labeled as such in biological databases even in cases where multiple distinct functions are known for the proteins. In this work, we propose a novel method named DextMP, which predicts whether a protein is a MP or not based on its textual features extracted from scientific literature and the UniProt database.

resultsDextMP extracts three categories of textual information for a protein: titles, abstracts from literature, and function description in UniProt. Three language models were applied and compared: a state-of-the-art deep unsupervised learning algorithm along with two other language models of different types, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency in the bag-of-words and Latent Dirichlet Allocation in the topic modeling category. Cross-validation results on a dataset of known MPs and non-MPs showed that DextMP successfully predicted MPs with over 91% accuracy with significant improvement over existing MP prediction methods. Lastly, we ran DextMP with the best performing language models and text-based feature combinations on three genomes, human, yeast and Xenopus laevis , and found that about 2.5-35% of the proteomes are potential MPs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code available at http://kiharalab.org/DextMP . CONTACT: dkihara@purdue.edu.

Indexed as

SoftwareUnsupervised Machine LearningAnimalsDatabases, FactualData MiningHumansModels, BiologicalMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteomicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaeXenopus laevis

Identifiers

PMID28881966
PMCPMC5870774

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.