ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017
DextMP: deep dive into text for predicting moonlighting proteins.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of Moonlighting Proteins from Published Literature Using Natural Language Processing and AI.The protein journal · 2026Article
- Article
- A community resource to mass explore the wheat grain proteome and its application to the late-maturity alpha-amylase (LMA) problem.GigaScience · 2022Article
- Predictive modeling of moonlighting DNA-binding proteins.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2022Article
- Moonlighting in Rickettsiales: Expanding Virulence Landscape.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022Review
- A method for identifying moonlighting proteins based on linear discriminant analysis and bagging-SVM.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Moonlighting Proteins Shine New Light on Molecular Signaling Niches.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Article
- Understanding protein multifunctionality: from short linear motifs to cellular functions.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019Review
- Spatial proteomics: a powerful discovery tool for cell biology.Nature reviews. Molecular cell biology · 2019Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationMoonlighting proteins (MPs) are an important class of proteins that perform more than one independent cellular function. MPs are gaining more attention in recent years as they are found to play important roles in various systems including disease developments. MPs also have a significant impact in computational function prediction and annotation in databases. Currently MPs are not labeled as such in biological databases even in cases where multiple distinct functions are known for the proteins. In this work, we propose a novel method named DextMP, which predicts whether a protein is a MP or not based on its textual features extracted from scientific literature and the UniProt database.
resultsDextMP extracts three categories of textual information for a protein: titles, abstracts from literature, and function description in UniProt. Three language models were applied and compared: a state-of-the-art deep unsupervised learning algorithm along with two other language models of different types, Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency in the bag-of-words and Latent Dirichlet Allocation in the topic modeling category. Cross-validation results on a dataset of known MPs and non-MPs showed that DextMP successfully predicted MPs with over 91% accuracy with significant improvement over existing MP prediction methods. Lastly, we ran DextMP with the best performing language models and text-based feature combinations on three genomes, human, yeast and Xenopus laevis , and found that about 2.5-35% of the proteomes are potential MPs. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code available at http://kiharalab.org/DextMP . CONTACT: dkihara@purdue.edu.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.