Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28881964›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2017

Orthologous Matrix (OMA) algorithm 2.0: more robust to asymmetric evolutionary rates and more scalable hierarchical orthologous group inference.

Clément-Marie Train, Natasha M Glover, Gaston H Gonnet, Adrian M Altenhoff, Christophe Dessimoz

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Computational function prediction of bacteria and phage proteins.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Elucidating the Mesocarp Drupe Transcriptome of Açai (International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Clément-Marie TrainDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Natasha M GloverDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gaston H GonnetDepartment of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Adrian M AltenhoffSwiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Christophe DessimozDepartment of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CHUniversity of Lausanne · CHETH Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationAccurate orthology inference is a fundamental step in many phylogenetics and comparative analysis. Many methods have been proposed, including OMA (Orthologous MAtrix). Yet substantial challenges remain, in particular in coping with fragmented genes or genes evolving at different rates after duplication, and in scaling to large datasets. With more and more genomes available, it is necessary to improve the scalability and robustness of orthology inference methods.

resultsWe present improvements in the OMA algorithm: (i) refining the pairwise orthology inference step to account for same-species paralogs evolving at different rates, and (ii) minimizing errors in the pairwise orthology verification step by testing the consistency of pairwise distance estimates, which can be problematic in the presence of fragmentary sequences. In addition we introduce a more scalable procedure for hierarchical orthologous group (HOG) clustering, which are several orders of magnitude faster on large datasets. Using the Quest for Orthologs consortium orthology benchmark service, we show that these changes translate into substantial improvement on multiple empirical datasets. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: This new OMA 2.0 algorithm is used in the OMA database ( http://omabrowser.org ) from the March 2017 release onwards, and can be run on custom genomes using OMA standalone version 2.0 and above ( http://omabrowser.org/standalone ). CONTACT: christophe.dessimoz@unil.ch or adrian.altenhoff@inf.ethz.ch.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularMutation RatePhylogenySoftwareAlgorithmsAnimalsGenomicsHumansMammals

Identifiers

PMID28881964
PMCPMC5870696
OpenAlexW2734735318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.