Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28881829›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Compliance with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol and prognosis after colorectal cancer surgery: A prospective cohort study.

Liang Li, Juying Jin, Su Min, Dan Liu, Ling Liu

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06010225 (The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06010225 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

The Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol Implementation in a National Tertiary-level Hospital: A Prospective Cohort Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorRidho Ardhi SyaifulRan2020 to 2023Enrolled84ConditionsEnhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol, Colorectal Surgery, Effectivity, Colorectal Neoplasms
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Implementation of ERAS Protocols: In Theory and Practice.Turkish journal of anaesthesiology and reanimation · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Current Status of and Barriers to the Implementation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in 77 Tertiary Hospitals].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Enhanced recovery for obese patients undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2020
    Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liang Li *Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Juying Jin *Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Su MinDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Dan LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Ling LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We explored the effects of different levels of compliance with an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol on the short-term prognosis of patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery. We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study in which 254 patients who received surgical treatment in a teaching tertiary care hospital were enrolled from March 2016 to November 2016. The patients were divided into four groups (I, II, III, and IV) based on individual compliance rates; the corresponding range of compliance rates was 0-60%, 60-70%, 70-80%, and 80-100%, and the number of patients in each group was 66, 63, 53, and 72, respectively. In the four groups from low to high compliance with ERAS (group I, II, III, and IV), the incidence of surgical site infections was 24.2%, 20.6%, 9.4%, and 6.9% (P < 0.05); the overall incidence of postoperative complications was 41.3%, 33.3%, 26.4%, and 16.7% (P < 0.05); the median length of postoperative hospital stay (in days) was 12.5, 10, 9, 8 (P < 0.05); and the median total hospital cost (Chinese Yuan) was 71,733, 73,632, 65,861, and 63,289 (P < 0.05), respectively. These results suggest that higher compliance with the ERAS protocol was associated with a lower incidence of surgical site infections, lower overall postoperative complication rate, shorter postoperative hospital stays, and lower total hospital costs.

Indexed as

colorectal cancercomplianceenhanced recovery after surgeryprognosis

Identifiers

PMID28881829
PMCPMC5581128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.