Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28881700›Full record

ReviewOncotarget2017

Nicoletta Coccaro, Giuseppina Tota, Antonella Zagaria, Luisa Anelli, Giorgina Specchia, Francesco Albano

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The landscape ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  7. The impact of SETBP1 mutations in neurological diseases and cancer.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Molecular Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy for Myelodysplastic Syndrome.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Where Are We Now?International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nicoletta CoccaroDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (D.E.T.O.), Hematology Section, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Giuseppina TotaDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (D.E.T.O.), Hematology Section, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Antonella ZagariaDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (D.E.T.O.), Hematology Section, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Luisa AnelliDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (D.E.T.O.), Hematology Section, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Giorgina SpecchiaDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (D.E.T.O.), Hematology Section, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Francesco AlbanoDepartment of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (D.E.T.O.), Hematology Section, University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
University of Bari Aldo Moro · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myeloid malignancies are characterized by an extreme molecular heterogeneity, and many efforts have been made in the past decades to clarify the mechanisms underlying their pathogenesis. In this scenario

Indexed as

mutationmyeloid neoplasmsoncogeneSchinzel–Giedion syndromeSETBP1

Identifiers

PMID28881700
PMCPMC5584301
OpenAlexW2606963524

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.