ArticleOncotarget2017
Expression and clinical significance of CD147 in renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis.
Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The prognostic and clinicopathologic characteristics of CD147 and esophagus cancer: A meta-analysis.PloS one · 2017Pooled it
- Expression of TNFR1, VEGFA, CD147 and MCT1 as early biomarkers of diabetes complications and the impact of aging on this profile.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Extracellular Vesicles-A New Potential Player in the Immunology of Renal Cell Carcinoma.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- A lectin-based glycomic approach identifies FUT8 as a driver of radioresistance in oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands) · 2020Article
- CD147 as a novel biomarker for predicting the prognosis and clinicopathological features of bladder cancer: a meta-analysis.Oncotarget · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo assess clinical significance of CD147 in renal cell carcinoma.
methodsCollect case-control studies which focus on CD147's expression in renal cell carcinoma. Trails were retrieved from CBM, CNKI, Wan-fang database, PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, data extraction and quality assessment were done by two researchers independently, and outcomes were pooled with Revman5.3 and STATA14.0.
resultsA total of 11 studies were confirmed, among which renal cell carcinoma 887 cases, non-cancer 505cases. As for the positive rate of CD147, there are statistical differences among survival, renal cell carcinoma tissue vs. non-cancer tissues [OR= 8.19, P= 0.0002], with vs. without lymph node metastases [OR= 6.52, P= 0.001], clinical stage III~IV vs. II~I [OR= 4.07, P< 0.00001], histopathological stage III~IV vs. II [OR= 3.01, P= 0.002], histopathological stage III~IV vs. I [OR= 7.50, P< 0.00001], tumor size [OR= 5.01, P= 0.0007]. No significant difference was tested among different age, gender, histological types and Position of cancer.
conclusionAs shown in our results, CD 147 may participate the whole course of carcinogenesis of renal cell carcinoma, which might be valuable for the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.