Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28881601›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Identification of a RNA-Seq based prognostic signature with five lncRNAs for lung squamous cell carcinoma.

Rui-Xue Tang, Wen-Jie Chen, Rong-Quan He, Jiang-Hui Zeng, Liang Liang, Shi-Kang Li, Jie Ma, Dian-Zhong Luo, Gang Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. From bulk, single-cell to spatial RNA sequencing.International journal of oral science · 2021
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Prognostic gene biomarker identification in liver cancer by data mining.American journal of translational research · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rui-Xue Tang *Department of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, P. R. China.
Wen-Jie Chen *Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, P. R. China.
Rong-Quan HeDepartment of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, P. R. China.
Jiang-Hui ZengDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, P. R. China.
Liang LiangDepartment of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University (West Branch), Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, P. R. China.
Shi-Kang LiDepartment of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Diseases, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, P. R. China.
Jie MaDepartment of Medical Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, P. R. China.
Dian-Zhong LuoDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, P. R. China.
Gang ChenDepartment of Pathology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, P. R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) expression profile signature for survival assessment in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC) are largely inconsistent due to distinct detecting approaches and small sample size. Systematic and integrative investigation of RNA-Seq based data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) herein was performed to determine candidate lncRNAs for prognosis evaluation of LUSC. A total of 60483 genes, including 7589 lncRNAs were assessed in a cohort including 478 LUSC cases with follow-up data. Firstly, 4225 differentially expressed lncRNAs were obtained via R packages. Next, univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression revealed that 41 lncRNAs were closely related to the survival of LUSC. Finally, lncRNA based prognosis index (PI) could predict overall survival of LUSC with high accuracy (AUC = 0.652, CI: 0.598, 0.705), PI = exp

Indexed as

biomarkerlncRNAsLUSCoverall survivalprognosis index

Identifiers

PMID28881601
PMCPMC5584202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.