Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28880972›Full record

Trial reportJAMA oncology2017

Effect of Modified Vaccinia Ankara-5T4 and Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide on Antitumor Immunity in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Martin Scurr, Tom Pembroke, Anja Bloom, David Roberts, Amanda Thomson, Kathryn Smart, Hayley Bridgeman, Richard Adams, Alison Brewster, Robert Jones and 7 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 66 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Cancer vaccines: current status and future directions.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Immunotherapy for colorectal cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Martin ScurrDivision of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.
Tom PembrokeDivision of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.
Anja BloomDivision of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.
David RobertsDivision of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.
Amanda ThomsonDivision of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.
Kathryn SmartDivision of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.
Hayley BridgemanDivision of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.
Richard AdamsVelindre Cancer Centre, National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Cardiff, Wales.
Alison BrewsterVelindre Cancer Centre, National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Cardiff, Wales.
Robert JonesVelindre Cancer Centre, National Health Service (NHS) Trust, Cardiff, Wales.
Sarah GwynneSouth West Wales Cancer Centre, Singleton Hospital, NHS Trust, Swansea.
Daniel BlountOxford BioMedica, plc, Oxford, England.
Richard HarropOxford BioMedica, plc, Oxford, England.
Melissa WrightCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.
Robert HillsCentre for Trials Research, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.
Awen GallimoreDivision of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.
Andrew GodkinDivision of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales.
Institute of Infection and Immunity · CAVelindre Cancer Centre · GBVelindre NHS Trust · GBCardiff and Vale University Health Board · GBCardiff University · GBSingleton Hospital · GBOxford BioMedica (United Kingdom) · GBUniversity of Wales Institute Cardiff · SG

Funding

Cancer Research UK 15954Cancer Research UK 21200Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

importanceThe success of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is not replicated in most cases of colorectal cancer; therefore, different strategies are urgently required. The oncofetal antigen 5T4 is expressed in more than 90% of cases of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Preliminary data using modified vaccinia Ankara-5T4 (MVA-5T4) in mCRC demonstrated that it safely induced serologic and T-cell responses.

objectiveTo determine whether antitumor immunity in mCRC could be increased using MVA-5T4, metronomic low-dose cyclophosphamide, or a combination of both treatments. DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsIn this randomized clinical trial, 55 patients with inoperable mCRC and prior stable disease after standard chemotherapy were enrolled at a single center and randomized to watch and wait (n = 9), cyclophosphamide treatment only (n = 9), MVA-5T4 only (n = 19), and a combination of MVA-5T4 and cyclophosphamide (n = 18). Patients were enrolled and treated from July 9, 2012, through February 8, 2016, and follow-up was completed on December 13, 2016. Data were analyzed based on intention to treat.

interventionsPatients randomized to a cyclophosphamide group received 50 mg twice daily on treatment days 1 to 7 and 15 to 21. Patients randomized to a MVA-5T4 group received an intramuscular injection at a dose of 1 × 109 50% tissue culture infectious dose on treatment days 22, 36, 50, 64, 78, and 106. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The predefined primary end point was the magnitude of anti-5T4 immune responses (5T4-specific T-cell and antibody levels) generated at treatment week 7. Secondary end points included analysis of the kinetics of anti-5T4 responses, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

resultsFifty-two patients (38 men and 14 women; mean [SD] age, 64.2 [10.1] years) were included in the study analysis. The 5T4-specific antibody immune responses were significantly increased in the MVA-5T4 (83.41 [36.09] relative units [RU]; P = .02) and combination treatment (65.81 [16.68] RU; P = .002) groups compared with no treatment (20.09 [7.20] RU). Cyclophosphamide depleted regulatory T cells in 24 of 27 patients receiving MVA-5T4, independently prolonging PFS (5.0 vs 2.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% CI, 0.21-1.11; P = .09). MVA-5T4 doubled baseline anti-5T4 responses in 16 of 35 patients, resulting in significantly prolonged PFS (5.6 vs 2.4 months; HR, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.09-0.47; P < .001) and OS (20.0 vs 10.3 months; HR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.14-0.74; P = .008). No grade 3 or 4 adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This initial randomized clinical immunotherapy study demonstrates a significant survival benefit in mCRC. Prior depletion of regulatory T cells by cyclophosphamide did not increase immune responses generated by MVA-5T4 vaccination; however, cyclophosphamide and MVA-5T4 each independently induced beneficial antitumor immune responses, resulting in prolonged survival without toxic effects. Larger clinical trials are planned to further validate these data.

trial registrationisrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN54669986.

Indexed as

ImmunotherapyAdultAgedAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCancer VaccinesColorectal NeoplasmsCyclophosphamideDisease-Free SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedT-LymphocytesVaccines, DNAAntigens, NeoplasmCancer VaccinesCyclophosphamideoncofetal antigensTroVaxVaccines, DNA

Identifiers

PMID28880972
PMCPMC5824319
OpenAlexW2753140990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.