Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28880931›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2017

Restrictive intraoperative fluid optimisation algorithm improves outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy: A prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Laurence Weinberg, Damian Ianno, Leonid Churilov, Ian Chao, Nick Scurrah, Clive Rachbuch, Jonathan Banting, Vijaragavan Muralidharan, David Story, Rinaldo Bellomo and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03799250 (Common Clinical Indices-guided Bolus-based vs. Continuous Fluid Management A Prospective, Randomized Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 36 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03799250 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Common Clinical Indices-guided Bolus-based vs. Continuous Fluid Management A Prospective, Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRabin Medical CenterRan2019 to 2020Enrolled200ConditionsRinger's LactateArmsRinger lactate, standard care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Optimal Perioperative Fluid Therapy Associates with Fewer Complications After Pancreaticoduodenectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Laurence WeinbergDepartment of Surgery, Austin Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7403-7680
Damian IannoDepartment of Anaesthesia, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Leonid ChurilovStatistics and Decision Analysis Academic Platform, The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, Melbourne Brain Centre, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Ian ChaoDepartment of Anaesthesia, Box Hill Hospital, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Nick ScurrahDepartment of Anaesthesia, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Clive RachbuchDepartment of Anaesthesia, Box Hill Hospital, Box Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Jonathan BantingDepartment of Anaesthesia, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Vijaragavan MuralidharanDepartment of Surgery, Austin Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
David StoryAnaesthesia and Perioperative and Pain Medicine Unit, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Rinaldo BellomoIntensive Care Unit, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Chris ChristophiDepartment of Surgery, Austin Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.
Mehrdad NikfarjamDepartment of Surgery, Austin Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy with or without a cardiac output goal directed therapy (GDT) algorithm. We conducted a multicentre randomised controlled trial in four high volume hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery centres. We evaluated whether the additional impact of a intraoperative fluid optimisation algorithm would influence the amount of fluid delivered, reduce fluid related complications, and improve length of hospital stay. Fifty-two consecutive adult patients were recruited. The median (IQR) duration of surgery was 8.6 hours (7.1:9.6) in the GDT group vs. 7.8 hours (6.8:9.0) in the usual care group (p = 0.2). Intraoperative fluid balance was 1005mL (475:1873) in the GDT group vs. 3300mL (2474:3874) in the usual care group (p<0.0001). Total volume of fluid administered intraoperatively was also lower in the GDT group: 2050mL (1313:2700) vs. 4088mL (3400:4525), p<0.0001 and vasoactive medications were used more frequently. There were no significant differences in proportions of patients experiencing overall complications (p = 0.179); however, fewer complications occurred in the GDT group: 44 vs. 92 (Incidence Rate Ratio: 0.41; 95%CI 0.24 to 0.69, p = 0.001). Median (IQR) length of hospital stay was 9.5 days (IQR: 7.0, 14.3) in the GDT vs. 12.5 days in the usual care group (IQR: 9.0, 22.3) for an Incidence Rate Ratio 0.64 (95% CI 0.48 to 0.85, p = 0.002). In conclusion, using a surgery-specific, patient-specific goal directed restrictive fluid therapy algorithm in this cohort of patients, can justify using enough fluid without causing oedema, yet as little fluid as possible without causing hypovolaemia i.e. "precision" fluid therapy. Our findings support the use of a perioperative haemodynamic optimization plan that prioritizes preservation of cardiac output and organ perfusion pressure by judicious use of fluid therapy, rational use of vasoactive drugs and timely application of inotropic drugs. They also suggest the need for further larger studies to confirm its findings.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAgedCardiac OutputFemaleFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPancreaticoduodenectomyProspective StudiesStroke VolumeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28880931
PMCPMC5589093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.