Advocacy for identifying certain animal diseases as "neglected".

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Functional genomics of trypanotolerant and trypanosusceptible cattle infected with Trypanosoma congolense across multiple time points and tissues.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025
   Article
2. A framework for quantifying the multisectoral burden of animal disease to support decision making.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
   Review
3. A novel lipase with dual localisation in Trypanosoma brucei.Scientific reports · 2022
   Article
4. The COMBAT project: controlling and progressively minimizing the burden of vector-borne animal trypanosomosis in Africa.Open research Europe · 2022
   Article
5. Ending the Neglect of Treatable Bacterial Zoonoses Responsible for Non-Malaria Fevers.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2021
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as