Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28879824›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2017

Under-reporting giardiasis: time to consider the public health implications.

S L Currie, N Stephenson, A S Palmer, B L Jones, G Hawkins, C L Alexander

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Identifying Molecular Changes inDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Assessment of Drug Activities againstPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  9. Molecular characterisation ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2022
    Article
  10. First case of community acquired giardiasis in Nuuk, Greenland.International journal of circumpolar health · 2021
    Article
  11. Giardiavirus: an update.Parasitology research · 2021
    Review
  12. The controversies surroundingCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S L CurrieScottish Parasite Diagnostic and Reference Laboratory,Glasgow,Scotland,UK.
N StephensonDepartment of Microbiology,Aberdeen Royal Infirmary,NHS Grampian,Aberdeen,Scotland,UK.
A S PalmerGastrointestinal and Zoonoses Section,Health Protection Scotland,Glasgow,Scotland,UK.
B L JonesScottish Parasite Diagnostic and Reference Laboratory,Glasgow,Scotland,UK.
G Hawkins
C L AlexanderScottish Parasite Diagnostic and Reference Laboratory,Glasgow,Scotland,UK.
Health Protection Scotland · GBNHS Grampian · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giardiasis is a treatable disease, caused by the flagellated protozoan parasite, Giardia duodenalis (G. duodenalis). It is one of the most common enteric parasites found globally to cause gastrointestinal disturbances, and infections may result in long-term irritable bowel syndrome-like symptoms. It is a common misconception that giardiasis is associated with foreign travel, which results in locally acquired cases in the UK being underdiagnosed. This report highlights the findings from one large Scottish Health Board, arising from a change in testing methodology, which resulted in the screening of all stools submitted for enteric investigations for G. duodenalis. Previous selection criteria were restricted to patients with a travel history to specific regions of the world, or on the basis of certain clinical details. In this report, clinical details were recorded from samples shown to be positive using two methods: an ELISA-based antigen detection assay and microscopy. Clinical details were assessed for a total of 28 laboratory-confirmed positive cases against the original selection criteria. Twenty-six cases (93%) would have been excluded from Giardia testing if the previous selection criteria had been applied. Although nine cases stated foreign travel, only two had been to regions deemed to be 'high risk'. Therefore, those seven cases that travelled to perceived 'low-risk' regions would have been excluded from testing for this reason. This summary highlights the need for significant improvements to the selection criteria for Giardia testing. Laboratories should be encouraged towards the testing of all routinely submitted stools for this neglected pathogen to ensure cases that are acquired locally are properly identified and treated effectively.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolDisease NotificationEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFecesFemaleGiardia lambliaGiardiasisHumansMaleMicroscopyMiddle AgedPublic HealthGastrointestinal infectionsGiardia lambliagiardiasisparasitespublic health microbiology

Identifiers

PMID28879824
PMCPMC9152757
OpenAlexW2752344523

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.