Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28879631›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of microbiology & biotechnology2017

Biodegradation of phenol and its derivatives by engineered bacteria: current knowledge and perspectives.

Lenka Rucká, Jan Nešvera, Miroslav Pátek

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of microbiology & biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Antioxidative Responses of Duckweed (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Biodegradation of aromatic pollutants meets synthetic biology.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Lenka RuckáInstitute of Microbiology of the CAS, v.v.i., Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
Jan NešveraInstitute of Microbiology of the CAS, v.v.i., Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Prague 4, Czech Republic.
Miroslav PátekInstitute of Microbiology of the CAS, v.v.i., Vídeňská 1083, 14220, Prague 4, Czech Republic. patek@biomed.cas.cz.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9882-0693
Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Microbiology · CZCzech Academy of Sciences · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodegradation of phenolic compounds is a promising alternative to physical and chemical methods used to remove these toxic pollutants from the environment. The ability of various microorganisms to metabolize phenol and its derivatives (alkylphenols, nitrophenols and halogenated derivatives) has therefore been intensively studied. Knowledge of the enzymes catalyzing the individual reactions, the genes encoding these enzymes and the regulatory mechanisms involved in the expression of the respective genes in bacteria serves as a basis for the development of more efficient degraders of phenols via genetic engineering methods. Engineered bacteria which efficiently degrade phenolic compounds were constructed in laboratories using various approaches such as cloning the catabolic genes in multicopy plasmids, the introduction of heterologous genes or broadening the substrate range of key enzymes by mutagenesis. Efforts to apply the engineered strains in in situ bioremediation are problematic, since engineered strains often do not compete successfully with indigenous microorganisms. New efficient degraders of phenolic compounds may be obtained by complex approaches at the organism level, such as genome shuffling or adaptive evolution. The application of these engineered bacteria for bioremediation will require even more complex analysis of both the biological characteristics of the degraders and the physico-chemical conditions at the polluted sites.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalBacteriaBacterial ProteinsDNA ShufflingGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenes, BacterialGenetic EngineeringNitrophenolsPhenolsBacterial ProteinsNitrophenolsPhenolsAdaptive evolutionGenome shufflingIn situ bioremediationPhenol biodegradationPhenolic compoundsSynthetic biology

Identifiers

PMID28879631
OpenAlexW2752099584

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.