Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28879619›Full record

ArticleEcoHealth2017

Borrelia miyamotoi, Other Vector-Borne Agents in Cat Blood and Ticks in Eastern Maryland.

Avery B Shannon, Renee Rucinsky, Holly D Gaff, R Jory Brinkerhoff

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in EcoHealth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The Global Molecular Prevalence ofTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of RevolutionParasites & vectors · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.) · 2021
    Article
  10. Journal of feline medicine and surgery · 2020
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Avery B ShannonDepartment of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, 23173, USA.
Renee RucinskyMid Atlantic Cat Hospital, Queenstown, MD, USA.
Holly D GaffDepartment of Biology, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA.
R Jory BrinkerhoffDepartment of Biology, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, 23173, USA. jbrinker@richmond.edu.
University of Richmond · USOld Dominion University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We collected blood and tick samples in eastern Maryland to quantify vector-borne pathogen exposure and infection in healthy cats and to assess occupational disease risk to veterinary professionals and others who regularly interact with household pets. Thirty-six percent of healthy cats parasitized by ticks at time of examination (9/25) were exposed to, and 14% of bloods (7/49) tested PCR-positive for, at least one vector-borne pathogen including several bloods and ticks with Borrelia miyamotoi, a recently recognized tick-borne zoonotic bacterium. There was no indication that high tick burdens were associated with exposure to vector-borne pathogens. Our results underscore the potential importance of cats to human vector-borne disease risk.

Indexed as

AnimalsBorreliaCat DiseasesCatsDNA, BacterialIxodesMarylandPetsPolymerase Chain ReactionTick-Borne DiseasesDNA, BacterialBorreliaOccupational riskTick-borne diseaseVeterinary medicineZoonosis

Identifiers

PMID28879619
OpenAlexW2751790557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.