Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28879035›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2016

Objective functional results in patients with knee osteoarthritis submitted to a 2-day educational programme: a prospective randomised clinical trial.

Marcia Uchoa de Rezende, Fabiane Elize Sabine de Farias, Cleidnéia Aparecida Clemente da Silva, Claudia Helena de Azevedo Cernigoy, Olavo Pires de Camargo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01572051 (Project Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01572051 nacompletednot on this map

Project Osteoarthritis: Recovering Quality of Life Through Education

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Sao Paulo General HospitalRan2011 to 2014Enrolled228ConditionsOsteoarthritis, Knee OsteoarthritisArmsEducational Course, Phone Calls, Printed Material
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marcia Uchoa de RezendeDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabiane Elize Sabine de FariasDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Cleidnéia Aparecida Clemente da SilvaDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Claudia Helena de Azevedo CernigoyDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Olavo Pires de CamargoDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough education is recommended for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA), its effectiveness in osteoarthritis (OA) remains low according to subjective questionnaires. The timed-up-and-go (TUG) and five-times-sit-to-stand tests (FTSST) reflect muscle strength and balance and could be used as objective measures of effectiveness.

aimTo measure the effect of an educational programme in patients with KOA by TUG and FTSST and correlate these results to those of subjective questionnaires.

methodsProspective randomised controlled trial of patients with KOA. Participants (n=198) were allocated into four groups. Three groups participated in 2 days of lectures with 1 (group 1), 2 (group 2) and 3-month (group 3) intervals between classes. Group 4 had no classes. Participants were asked to exercise at least three times a week. Half of the patients from all groups received bimonthly telephone calls reinforcing diet and exercise instructions. All four groups received the printed and video material presented in the classes. At baseline and at 1 year after initial assessment, patients performed the FTSST and TUG and answered WOMAC, Lequesne, SF-36 and Visual Analogue Scale questionnaires.

resultsThe TUG results did not change at 1 year follow-up, whereas FTSST improved (average difference of 4.66, p<0.001) irrespective of the implementation of classes or telephone calls. Both baseline and 1 year TUG and FTSST results correlated weakly (r<0.3) to the subjective functional, pain and quality of life results (p<0.001).

conclusionsThis educational programme improved function as determined by lower limb muscle strength (FTSST) irrespective of the patients' subjective non-improvement. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinical trials registration number: NCT01572051. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1A.

Indexed as

functional testingjoint diseaserehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID28879035
PMCPMC5569271
OpenAlexW2588187483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.