Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28879027›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2016

Movement and physical demands of school and university rugby union match-play in England.

Dale Read, Daniel Weaving, Padraic Phibbs, Joshua Darrall-Jones, Gregory Roe, Jonathon Weakley, Sharief Hendricks, Kevin Till, Ben Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. New Zealand Youth Rugby Sevens: A Comparative Match Demands Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dale ReadInstitute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Daniel WeavingInstitute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Padraic PhibbsInstitute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Joshua Darrall-JonesInstitute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Gregory RoeInstitute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Jonathon WeakleyInstitute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Sharief HendricksInstitute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Kevin TillInstitute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Ben JonesInstitute for Sport, Physical Activity and Leisure, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn England, rugby union is a popular sport and is widely played within schools. Despite the large participation numbers, the movement and physical demands of the sport and how they progress by age have not been explored.

methodNinety-six male rugby union players wore microtechnology devices during six rugby union matches within the education pathway to investigate the movement and physical demands of match-play. To quantify the positional differences and progression by age, data were obtained for participants at the under 16 (U16) (n=31 participants), under 18 (U18) (n=34 participants) and university (n=31 participants) levels. Players were further divided in forwards and backs. Data were analysed using magnitude-based inferences.

resultsFor the movement demands, U16 total distance and 'striding' was likely higher for forwards than backs, whereas at U18, unclear differences were observed and from university players the inverse was observed (very likely). In all age groups sprint distance was likely to very likely greater for backs than forwards. Forwards had greater physical demands than backs at all age groups. For consecutive age groups, U16 had a likely higher relative distance than U18, and U18 had a likely lower relative distance than university players. Physical demands were similar across age groups for forwards, and greater for backs at older age groups.

conclusionThe movement and physical demands of rugby union players participating in schools (U16 and U18), may not be as expected, however, the findings from university players show a similar pattern to the senior game.

Indexed as

AdolescentContact sportsRugbySchool

Identifiers

PMID28879027
PMCPMC5569272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.