Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28878834›Full record

ArticleMaedica2017

Combined Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction.

Stefan Mogos, Bogdan Sendrea, Ioan Cristian Stoica

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maedica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefan MogosFoisor Orthopaedics Clinical Hospital, 35-37 Ferdinand Avenue, Bucharest, Romania ; University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania.
Bogdan SendreaFoisor Orthopaedics Clinical Hospital, 35-37 Ferdinand Avenue, Bucharest, Romania.
Ioan Cristian StoicaFoisor Orthopaedics Clinical Hospital, 35-37 Ferdinand Avenue, Bucharest, Romania ; University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the current paper was to report the surgical technique of combined anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction as well as the short term clinical results after this surgical procedure. MATERIAL AND

methodsThe current prospective study included 32 patients (5 females and 27 males) with combined ACL and ALL reconstruction performed between December 2015 and July 2016. The patients were included in the study taking into consideration the following criteria: chronic ACL lesion, high grade rotational instability (pivot shift grade II and III) and participation in high grade pivoting sports. Patient evaluation followed an established clinical and imaging protocol both preoperatively and at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. This included clinical knee stability testing (Lachman test, Pivot shift test), Rolimeter differential laxity testing, subjective and objective IKDC scores and Lysholm score and Tegner score.

resultsPostoperative stability at 6 weeks and 12 weeks as tested with Lachman test (p=0.02 and 0.01, respectively), pivot shift test (p=0.03 and 0.01, respectively) and the Rolimeter arthrometer (p=0.008 and 0.006, respectively) showed a statistically significant difference as compared to preoperative values. Postoperative scores at 6 weeks and 12 weeks as measured using objective IKDC form (p=0.008 and 0.006, respectively), subjective IKDC form (p=0.04 and 0.03, respectively) and Lysholm form (p=0.02 and 0.01, respectively) were statistically significant improved as compared to preoperative values. All patients had a negative Lachman test at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively. One patient had a positive grade I pivot shift test at 6 weeks postoperatively and two patients had a positive grade I pivot shift test at 12 weeks postoperatively. Differential anteroposterior laxity as measured with the Rolimeter arthrometer improved from 7.19±1.96 mm preoperatively to 0.28±0.45 mm and 0.13±0.34 mm, at 6 weeks and 12 weeks postoperatively, respectively. According to the objective IKDC form, 29 patients were normal or nearly normal (grade A and B) at 6 weeks postoperatively and 31 patients were normal or nearly normal at 12 weeks postoperatively. Subjective IKDC score improved from 47.72±17.18 preoperatively to 56.52±11.74 and 73.38±14.28 at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively, respectively. Lysholm score improved from 63.44±23.01 preoperatively to 80.41±11.94 and 90.47±8.22 at 6 and 12 weeks postoperatively, respectively. Improved Tegner activity scores were present at 12 weeks postoperatively as compared with 6 weeks postoperatively, but still lower as compared to pre-traumatic scores. No significant complications were present in the current study group.

conclusionsCombined ACL and ALL reconstruction is an effective surgical procedure, with improved postoperative clinical results and no significant short term complications. Longer follow-up is necessary in order to better evaluate the results of this procedure.

Identifiers

PMID28878834
PMCPMC5574069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.