Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28878763›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2017

Experimental Hyalohyphomycosis by

Danielly C M de Sequeira, Rodrigo C Menezes, Manoel M E Oliveira, Paulo R Z Antas, Paula M De Luca, Joseli de Oliveira-Ferreira, Cintia de Moraes Borba

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Cerebrospinal fluid: a target of some fungi and an overview.Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz · 2023
    Article
  7. Production ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Fungal communities associated withJournal of nematology · 2020
    Article
  12. Complete mitochondrial genome of the important bio-control fungusMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2019
    Article
  13. Medical mycology case reports · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Human PathogenicMicroorganisms · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Danielly C M de SequeiraLaboratory of Taxonomy, Biochemistry and Bioprospecting of Fungi, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz FoundationRio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Rodrigo C MenezesLaboratory of Clinical Research in Dermatozoonosis, Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectology, Oswaldo Cruz FoundationRio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Manoel M E OliveiraLaboratory of Mycology, Evandro Chagas National Institute of Infectology, Oswaldo Cruz FoundationRio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Paulo R Z AntasLaboratory of Clinical Immunology, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz FoundationRio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Paula M De LucaLaboratory of Immunoparasitology, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz FoundationRio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Joseli de Oliveira-FerreiraLaboratory of Immunoparasitology, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz FoundationRio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Cintia de Moraes BorbaLaboratory of Taxonomy, Biochemistry and Bioprospecting of Fungi, Oswaldo Cruz Institute, Oswaldo Cruz FoundationRio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

experimental modelhyalohyphomycosisimmune responseimmunosuppressionPurpureocillium lilacinum

Identifiers

PMID28878763
PMCPMC5572354
OpenAlexW2750238764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.