Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28878676›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2017

PD-1 and PD-L1 Checkpoint Signaling Inhibition for Cancer Immunotherapy: Mechanism, Combinations, and Clinical Outcome.

Hashem O Alsaab, Samaresh Sau, Rami Alzhrani, Katyayani Tatiparti, Ketki Bhise, Sushil K Kashaw, Arun K Iyer

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 943 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
943citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
70.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

943 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 1,726 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anti-PD-(L)1 Antibodies: Insights From QSP-Based Meta-Analysis.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Journal of gastrointestinal cancer · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

883 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Hashem O AlsaabUse-Inspired Biomaterials and Integrated Nano Delivery Systems Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State UniversityDetroit, MI, United States.
Samaresh SauUse-Inspired Biomaterials and Integrated Nano Delivery Systems Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State UniversityDetroit, MI, United States.
Rami AlzhraniUse-Inspired Biomaterials and Integrated Nano Delivery Systems Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State UniversityDetroit, MI, United States.
Katyayani TatipartiUse-Inspired Biomaterials and Integrated Nano Delivery Systems Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State UniversityDetroit, MI, United States.
Ketki BhiseUse-Inspired Biomaterials and Integrated Nano Delivery Systems Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State UniversityDetroit, MI, United States.
Sushil K KashawUse-Inspired Biomaterials and Integrated Nano Delivery Systems Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State UniversityDetroit, MI, United States.
Arun K IyerUse-Inspired Biomaterials and Integrated Nano Delivery Systems Laboratory, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State UniversityDetroit, MI, United States.
Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences · USWayne State University · USTaif University · SA

Funding

Targeted Platinates/siRNA Combination Therapy for Resistant Lung CancerR21CA179652 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI AMIJI, MANSOOR M., IYER, ARUN · 2014 to 2015
$372k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA179652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several cancers are highly refractory to conventional chemotherapy. The survival of tumors in several cases is assisted by checkpoint immunomodulation to maintain the imbalance between immune surveillance and cancer cell proliferation. Check point antibody inhibitors, such as anti-PD-1/PD-L1, are a novel class of inhibitors that function as a tumor suppressing factor via modulation of immune cell-tumor cell interaction. These checkpoint blockers are rapidly becoming a highly promising cancer therapeutic approach that yields remarkable antitumor responses with limited side effects. In recent times, more than four check point antibody inhibitors have been commercialized for targeting PD-1, PDL-1, and CTLA-4. Despite the huge success and efficacy of the anti-PD therapy response, it is limited to specific types of cancers, which attributes to the insufficient and heterogeneous expression of PD-1 in the tumor microenvironment. Herein, we review the current landscape of the PD-1/PD-L1 mechanistic role in tumor immune evasion and therapeutic outcome for cancer treatment. We also review the current progress in clinical trials, combination of drug therapy with immunotherapy, safety, and future of check point inhibitors for multiple types of cancer.

Indexed as

atezolizumabchallenges and new approachcombination immune therapyimmune resistanceimmunotherapynivolumabPD-1/PDL-1 mechanismtumor stroma role in PD-1/PD-L1

Identifiers

PMID28878676
PMCPMC5572324
OpenAlexW2747016053

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.