Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28878625›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2017

Non-autonomous Cellular Responses to Ototoxic Drug-Induced Stress and Death.

Shimon P Francis, Lisa L Cunningham

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Early Physiological and Cellular Indicators of Cisplatin-Induced Ototoxicity.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Noise: Acoustic Trauma and Tinnitus, the US Military Experience.Otolaryngologic clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of FoxG1 in the Inner Ear.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Purinergic Signaling and Cochlear Injury-Targeting the Immune System?International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Necroptosis and Apoptosis Contribute to Cisplatin and Aminoglycoside Ototoxicity.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Organotypic Culture of Neonatal Murine Inner Ear Explants.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Aminoglycoside-Induced Cochleotoxicity: A Review.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2017
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shimon P FrancisNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of HealthBethesda, MD, United States.
Lisa L CunninghamNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of HealthBethesda, MD, United States.

Funding

Mechanisms of Sensory Hair Cell Survival and DeathZIADC000079 · NIDCD · NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DEAFNESS AND OTHER COMMUNICATION DISORDERS · PI CUNNINGHAM, LISA L · 2011 to 2025
$27.2M
Intramural NIH HHS ZIA DC000079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The first major recognition of drug-induced hearing loss can be traced back more than seven decades to the development of streptomycin as an antimicrobial agent. Since then at least 130 therapeutic drugs have been recognized as having ototoxic side-effects. Two important classes of ototoxic drugs are the aminoglycoside antibiotics and the platinum-based antineoplastic agents. These drugs save the lives of millions of people worldwide, but they also cause irreparable hearing loss. In the inner ear, sensory hair cells (HCs) and spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) are important cellular targets of these drugs, and most mechanistic studies have focused on the cell-autonomous responses of these cell types in response to ototoxic stress. Despite several decades of studies on ototoxicity, important unanswered questions remain, including the cellular and molecular mechanisms that determine whether HCs and SGNs will live or die when confronted with ototoxic challenge. Emerging evidence indicates that other cell types in the inner ear can act as mediators of survival or death of sensory cells and SGNs. For example, glia-like supporting cells (SCs) can promote survival of both HCs and SGNs. Alternatively, SCs can act to promote HC death and inhibit neural fiber expansion. Similarly, tissue resident macrophages activate either pro-survival or pro-death signaling that can influence HC survival after exposure to ototoxic agents. Together these data indicate that autonomous responses that occur within a stressed HC or SGN are not the only (and possibly not the primary) determinants of whether the stressed cell ultimately lives or dies. Instead non-cell-autonomous responses are emerging as significant determinants of HC and SGN survival vs. death in the face of ototoxic stress. The goal of this review is to summarize the current evidence on non-cell-autonomous responses to ototoxic stress and to discuss ways in which this knowledge may advance the development of therapies to reduce hearing loss caused by these drugs.

Indexed as

aminoglycosidecisplatinglial cellsmacrophagesnon-autonomousototoxicity

Identifiers

PMID28878625
PMCPMC5572385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.