Trial reportNagoya journal of medical science2017
Effect of text messages to improve health literacy on medication adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled pilot trial.
Trial report in Nagoya journal of medical science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Text messaging interventions are associated with reductions in HbA1c among patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open diabetes research & care · 2025Pooled it
- Diabetes self-management education and support delivered by mobile health (mHealth) interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes-A systematic review and meta-analysis.Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association · 2025Pooled it
- What is the effect of mobile phone text message reminders on medication adherence among adult type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.BMC endocrine disorders · 2023Pooled it
- The Effect of Health Literacy Intervention on Patients with Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Trial
- Improved medication adherence and health literacy in parents of children with ADHD: Effects of a targeted educational program.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2025Article
- Medication Adherence Interventions Among People Living with Diabetes: A Systematic Review.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Review
- The Use of Text Messaging to Improve Clinical Engagement for Individuals With Psychosis: Systematic Review.JMIR mental health · 2020Review
- Good Literacy to Enhance Response in Diabetes Mellitus (GLITTER-DM).Innovations in pharmacy · 2020Article
- Treatment patterns, persistence and adherence rates in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Japan: a claims-based cohort study.BMJ open · 2019Article
- Identifying and Understanding Barriers and Facilitators to Medication Adherence Among Marshallese Adults in Arkansas.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
It has been suggested that low health literacy (HL) is associated with poor medication adherence. This study aimed to examine the effect of a text message-based HL intervention to promote medication adherence, compared with text messages that only sent medication reminders, in patients with type 2 diabetes. This was a single-center, open-label, randomized (1:1) controlled pilot study. The study period was 6 months. Intervention group was sent HL related text messages, compared to the reminder messages that were sent to the control group. The primary outcome was the difference in the change rate of scores on the Morisky Eight-Item Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8). Forty-one participants were randomized into the intervention (n = 21) and control (n = 20) groups and completed the 6-month follow-up. Although almost participants read and understood the information provided in the messages, no significant difference was observed between groups for the primary outcome (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.