Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28878384›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Combination of optical coherence tomography and near infrared spectroscopy enhances determination of articular cartilage composition and structure.

Jaakko K Sarin, Lassi Rieppo, Harold Brommer, Isaac O Afara, Simo Saarakkala, Juha Töyräs

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A review of low-cost and portable optical coherence tomography.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2021
    Article
  7. Engineering fiber anisotropy within natural collagen hydrogels.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jaakko K SarinDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland. jaakko.sarin@uef.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6237-9015
Lassi RieppoDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
Harold BrommerDepartment of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Isaac O AfaraDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7114-0439
Simo SaarakkalaResearch Unit of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland.
Juha TöyräsDepartment of Applied Physics, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland.
University of Eastern Finland · FIOulu University Hospital · FIUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conventional arthroscopic evaluation of articular cartilage is subjective and poorly reproducible. Therefore, implementation of quantitative diagnostic techniques, such as near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT), is essential. Locations (n = 44) with various cartilage conditions were selected from mature equine fetlock joints (n = 5). These locations and their surroundings were measured with NIRS and OCT (n = 530). As a reference, cartilage proteoglycan (PG) and collagen contents, and collagen network organization were determined using quantitative microscopy. Additionally, lesion severity visualized in OCT images was graded with an automatic algorithm according to International Cartilage Research Society (ICRS) scoring system. Artificial neural network with variable selection was then employed to predict cartilage composition in the superficial and deep zones from NIRS data, and the performance of two models, generalized (including all samples) and condition-specific models (based on ICRS-grades), was compared. Spectral data correlated significantly (p < 0.002) with PG and collagen contents, and collagen orientation in the superficial and deep zones. The combination of NIRS and OCT provided the most reliable outcome, with condition-specific models having lower prediction errors (9.2%) compared to generalized models (10.4%). Therefore, the results highlight the potential of combining both modalities for comprehensive evaluation of cartilage during arthroscopy.

Indexed as

Spectroscopy, Near-InfraredTomography, Optical CoherenceAlgorithmsAnimalsCartilage, ArticularCollagenDensitometryHorsesImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMicroscopy, PolarizationNeural Networks, ComputerSurface PropertiesCollagen

Identifiers

PMID28878384
PMCPMC5587743
OpenAlexW2750980712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.