Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28878380›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

An in-silico approach to predict and exploit synthetic lethality in cancer metabolism.

Iñigo Apaolaza, Edurne San José-Eneriz, Luis Tobalina, Estíbaliz Miranda, Leire Garate, Xabier Agirre, Felipe Prósper, Francisco J Planes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Iñigo ApaolazaCEIT and Tecnun, University of Navarra, Manuel de Lardizábal 13, 20018, San Sebastián, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8961-4513
Edurne San José-EnerizArea de Hemato-Oncología, IDISNA, Ciberonc, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA), University of Navarra, Pío XII 55, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Luis TobalinaCEIT and Tecnun, University of Navarra, Manuel de Lardizábal 13, 20018, San Sebastián, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1947-8309
Estíbaliz MirandaArea de Hemato-Oncología, IDISNA, Ciberonc, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA), University of Navarra, Pío XII 55, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Leire GarateArea de Hemato-Oncología, IDISNA, Ciberonc, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA), University of Navarra, Pío XII 55, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Xabier AgirreArea de Hemato-Oncología, IDISNA, Ciberonc, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA), University of Navarra, Pío XII 55, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
Felipe PrósperArea de Hemato-Oncología, IDISNA, Ciberonc, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada (CIMA), University of Navarra, Pío XII 55, 31008, Pamplona, Spain. fprosper@unav.es.
Francisco J PlanesCEIT and Tecnun, University of Navarra, Manuel de Lardizábal 13, 20018, San Sebastián, Spain. fplanes@tecnun.es.
Universidad de Navarra · ESCentro de Estudios e Investigaciones Técnicas de Gipuzkoa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synthetic lethality is a promising concept in cancer research, potentially opening new possibilities for the development of more effective and selective treatments. Here, we present a computational method to predict and exploit synthetic lethality in cancer metabolism. Our approach relies on the concept of genetic minimal cut sets and gene expression data, demonstrating a superior performance to previous approaches predicting metabolic vulnerabilities in cancer. Our genetic minimal cut set computational framework is applied to evaluate the lethality of ribonucleotide reductase catalytic subunit M1 (RRM1) inhibition in multiple myeloma. We present a computational and experimental study of the effect of RRM1 inhibition in four multiple myeloma cell lines. In addition, using publicly available genome-scale loss-of-function screens, a possible mechanism by which the inhibition of RRM1 is effective in cancer is established. Overall, our approach shows promising results and lays the foundation to build a novel family of algorithms to target metabolism in cancer.Exploiting synthetic lethality is a promising approach for cancer therapy. Here, the authors present an approach to identifying such interactions by finding genetic minimal cut sets (gMCSs) that block cancer proliferation, and apply it to study the lethality of RRM1 inhibition in multiple myeloma.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCell Line, TumorGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene SilencingGenes, NeoplasmHumansNeoplasmsSynthetic Lethal Mutations

Identifiers

PMID28878380
PMCPMC5587678
OpenAlexW2752877365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.