Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28878059›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2017

Can hook-bending be let off the hook? Bending/unbending of pliant tools by cockatoos.

I B Laumer, T Bugnyar, S A Reber, A M I Auersperg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ratcheting up tool innovation in Goffin's cockatoos (Ethology : formerly Zeitschrift fur Tierpsychologie · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Problem Solving in Animals: Proposal for an Ontogenetic Perspective.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Innovative problem solving in macaws.Learning & behavior · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Goffin's Cockatoos (Frontiers in psychology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

I B LaumerDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria isabelle.laumer@univie.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1597-0072
T BugnyarDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
S A ReberDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Althanstr. 14, 1090 Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8819-7009
A M I AuerspergMesserli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine (other partner institutions: University of Vienna, Medical University of Vienna), Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF J 3404Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29075Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29084
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spontaneous crafting of hook-tools from bendable material to lift a basket out of a vertical tube in corvids has widely been used as one of the prime examples of animal tool innovation. However, it was recently suggested that the animals' solution was hardly innovative but strongly influenced by predispositions from habitual tool use and nest building. We tested Goffin's cockatoo, which is neither a specialized tool user nor a nest builder, on a similar task set-up. Three birds individually learned to bend hook tools from straight wire to retrieve food from vertical tubes and four subjects unbent wire to retrieve food from horizontal tubes. Pre-experience with ready-made hooks had some effect but was not necessary for success. Our results indicate that the ability to represent and manufacture tools according to a current need does not require genetically hardwired behavioural routines, but can indeed arise innovatively from domain general cognitive processing.

Indexed as

CockatoosLearningTool Use BehaviorAnimalsavian cognitioninnovationproblem solvingtool manufacturetool use

Identifiers

PMID28878059
PMCPMC5597828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.