Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28877743›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2017

Evaluation of the efficacy of sarolaner (Simparica®) in the prevention of babesiosis in dogs.

Thomas Geurden, Robert Six, Csilla Becskei, Steven Maeder, Anne Lloyd, Sean Mahabir, Josephus Fourie, Julian Liebenberg

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Efficacy of lotilaner (CredelioParasites & vectors · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Canine Babesiosis Caused by LargeAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  7. Efficacy of sarolaner (SimparicaParasites & vectors · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas GeurdenZoetis, Mercuriusstraat 20, B-1930, Zaventem, Belgium. thomas.geurden@zoetis.com.
Robert SixZoetis, 333 Portage Street, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Csilla BecskeiZoetis, Mercuriusstraat 20, B-1930, Zaventem, Belgium.
Steven MaederZoetis, 333 Portage Street, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Anne LloydZoetis, Mercuriusstraat 20, B-1930, Zaventem, Belgium.
Sean MahabirZoetis, 333 Portage Street, Kalamazoo, MI, 49007, USA.
Josephus FourieClinvet International, PO Box 11186, 9321, Uitsig Road, Universitas, Bloemfontein, 9338, South Africa.
Julian LiebenbergClinvet International, PO Box 11186, 9321, Uitsig Road, Universitas, Bloemfontein, 9338, South Africa.
Zoetis (Belgium) · BEZoetis (United States) · USClinvet · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCanine babesiosis is a clinically significant emerging vector-borne disease caused among others by the protozoan Babesia canis. The efficacy of sarolaner (Simparica®; Zoetis; at the minimum recommended label dose of 2.0 mg per kg bodyweight) in the prevention of babesiosis was evaluated in twenty-four dogs randomly allocated to either a placebo-treated group or one of two sarolaner-treated groups. At 21 or 28 days after treatment administration, dogs were infested with 50 ± 4 Dermacentor reticulatus ticks of which 25% were confirmed to be infected with Babesia canis. Blood samples were collected from each dog prior to tick infestation and weekly thereafter until 49 days after infestation. The blood was assayed for B. canis antibodies using an indirect immunofluorescence test (IFAT) and for B. canis DNA by PCR assay. A dog was a priori defined as B. canis-positive if it tested positive by both IFAT and PCR at any time during the study.

resultsNo treatment-related adverse reactions were recorded during the study. All placebo-treated animals displayed clinical signs due to babesiosis and tested positive on both IFAT and PCR. None of the sarolaner-treated animals displayed any clinical symptoms or tested positive on both IFAT and PCR, resulting in a 100% efficacy in the prevention of canine babesiosis (P = 0.0002).

conclusionWhen given 21 or 28 days before tick infestation, a single treatment with sarolaner at the minimum recommended label dose of 2.0 mg per kg body weight prevented the transmission of B. canis by D. reticulatus to dogs.

Indexed as

AcaricidesAdministration, OralAnimalsAntibodies, ProtozoanArachnid VectorsAzetidinesBabesiaBabesiosisDermacentorDNA, ProtozoanDog DiseasesDogsPolymerase Chain ReactionSpiro CompoundsTick InfestationsAcaricidesAntibodies, ProtozoanAzetidinesDNA, ProtozoansarolanerSpiro CompoundsBabesia canisBabesiosisDermacentor reticulatusDogsEfficacyTransmission

Identifiers

PMID28877743
PMCPMC5588728
OpenAlexW2753258990

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.