Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28877729›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

Effect of enhanced feedback to hospitals that are part of an emerging clinical information network on uptake of revised childhood pneumonia treatment policy: study protocol for a cluster randomized trial.

Philip Ayieko, Grace Irimu, Mike English

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyPragmatic Clinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02817971 (Effect of Enhanced Feedback to Hospitals That Are Part of an Emerging Clinical Information Network on Uptake of Revised Childhood Pneumonia Treatment Policy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02817971 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Enhanced Feedback to Hospitals That Are Part of an Emerging Clinical Information Network on Uptake of Revised Childhood Pneumonia Treatment Policy: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial Protocol

TypeinterventionalSponsorKEMRI-Wellcome Trust Collaborative Research ProgramRan2016 to 2016Enrolled900ConditionsPneumoniaArmsEnhanced feedback, Standard feedback
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Philip AyiekoKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. PAyieko@kemri-wellcome.org.
Grace IrimuKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.
Mike EnglishKenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI) - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Nairobi, Kenya.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 097170
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe national pneumonia treatment guidelines in Kenya changed in February 2016 but such guideline changes are often characterized by prolonged delays in affecting practice. We designed an enhanced feedback intervention, delivered within an ongoing clinical network that provides a general form of feedback, aimed at improving and sustaining uptake of the revised pneumonia treatment policy. The objective was to determine whether an enhanced feedback intervention will improve correctness of classification and treatment of childhood pneumonia, compared to an existing approach to feedback, after nationwide treatment policy change and within an existing hospital network. METHODS/

designA pragmatic, cluster randomized trial conducted within a clinical network of 12 Kenyan county referral hospitals providing inpatient pediatric care to children (aged 2-59 months) with acute medical conditions between March and November 2016. The intervention comprised enhanced feedback (monthly written feedback incorporating goal setting, and action planning delivered by a senior clinical coordinator for selected pneumonia indicators) and this was compared to standard feedback (2-monthly written feedback on multiple quality of pediatric care indicators) both delivered within a clinical network promoting clinical leadership linked to mentorship and peer-to-peer support, and improved use of health information on service delivery. The 12 hospitals were randomized to receive either enhanced feedback (n = 6) or standard feedback (n = 6) delivered over a 9-month period following nationwide pneumonia treatment policy change. The primary outcome is the proportion of all admitted patients with pneumonia (fulfilling criteria for treatment with orally administered amoxicillin) who are correctly classified and treated in the first 24 h. The secondary outcome will be measured over the course of the admission as any change in treatment for pneumonia after the first 24 h. DISCUSSION: This trial protocol employs a pragmatic trial design during a period of nationwide change in treatment guidelines to address two high-priority areas within implementation research: promoting adoption of health policies and optimizing effectiveness of feedback.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT02817971 . Registered retrospectively on 27 June 2016.

Indexed as

Feedback, PsychologicalAdministration, OralAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAttitude of Health PersonnelChild, PreschoolGuideline AdherenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHospital Information SystemsHospitalsHumansInfantKenyaLeadershipLegislation, HospitalMentorsAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAuditCluster trialFeedbackGuidelinesPneumoniaPragmatic trialQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID28877729
PMCPMC5588612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.