Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28877707›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2017

Semi-high-throughput detection of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax oocysts in mosquitoes using bead-beating followed by circumsporozoite ELISA and quantitative PCR.

Wouter Graumans, Fitsum G Tadesse, Chiara Andolina, Geert-Jan van Gemert, Karina Teelen, Kjerstin Lanke, Endalamaw Gadisa, Delenasaw Yewhalaw, Marga van de Vegte-Bolmer, Rianne Siebelink-Stoter and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Using qPCR to compare the detection ofFrontiers in parasitology · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Evidence of G-Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCR) in the Parasitic ProtozoaInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Prevalence of asymptomaticWellcome open research · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Wouter GraumansDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Fitsum G TadesseDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Chiara AndolinaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Geert-Jan van GemertDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Karina TeelenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kjerstin LankeDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Endalamaw GadisaArmauer Hansen Research Institute (AHRI), Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Delenasaw YewhalawTropical and Infectious Diseases Research Center (TIDRC), Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Marga van de Vegte-BolmerDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rianne Siebelink-StoterDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Isaïe ReulingDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Robert SauerweinDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Teun BousemaDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. teun.bousema@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2666-094X
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLArmauer Hansen Research Institute · ETJimma University · ET

Funding

Transmission ProjectU19AI089674 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI MATTHEW G DORSEY · 2010 to 2026
$29.3M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI089674
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe malaria infection status of mosquitoes is commonly determined by microscopic detection of oocysts on the dissected mosquito midgut. This method is labour-intensive, does not allow processing of large numbers of mosquitoes and can be challenging in terms of objective classification of oocysts. Here, a semi-high-throughput bead-beating ELISA method is proposed for detection of the circumsporozoite protein (CSP) followed by confirmation by quantitative PCR (qPCR).

methodsCultured Plasmodium falciparum gametocytes were offered to Anopheles stephensi mosquitoes and examined by microscopy. After bead-beating, mosquito homogenate was examined by CSP-ELISA and 18S qPCR. As negative controls, mosquitoes that were offered a heat-inactivated gametocyte blood meal were used. The CSP-ELISA/qPCR methodology was applied to high and low-intensity infections of cultured P. falciparum gametocytes. A similar methodology optimized for P. vivax was used on mosquitoes that were offered blood from Ethiopian donors who were naturally infected with P. vivax.

resultsThere was considerable variation in CSP-ELISA signal and qPCR values in mosquitoes with low oocyst intensities. There was a strong agreement mosquito positivity by CSP-ELISA and by qPCR in mosquitoes that fed on cultured P. falciparum material (agreement 96.9%; kappa = 0.97) and naturally infected P. vivax parasite carriers [agreement 92.4% (kappa = 0.83)].

conclusionsThe proposed bead-beating CSP-ELISA/qPCR methodology considerably increases throughput for the detection of mosquito infection. qPCR remains necessary to confirm infections in mosquitoes with low CSP-ELISA signal. This methodology may prove particularly useful for studies where very low mosquito infection prevalence is expected and study sites where experience with oocyst detection is limited.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnophelesAntigens, ProtozoanDNA, ProtozoanEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansInsect VectorsOocystsPlasmodium falciparumPlasmodium vivaxProtozoan ProteinsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, Ribosomal, 18SSensitivity and SpecificityAntigens, Protozoancircumsporozoite protein, ProtozoanDNA, ProtozoanProtozoan ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal, 18SAnophelesGametocyteInfectivityOocystSporozoiteTransmission

Identifiers

PMID28877707
PMCPMC5588624
OpenAlexW2753602123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.