Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28877699›Full record

ReviewBMC palliative care2017

Honoring the voices of bereaved caregivers: a Metasummary of qualitative research.

Lorraine Holtslander, Sharon Baxter, Kelly Mills, Sarah Bocking, Tina Dadgostari, Wendy Duggleby, Vicky Duncan, Peter Hudson, Agatha Ogunkorode, Shelley Peacock

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC palliative care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Volunteering of Former Caregivers: A Pilot Intervention Study in the Chinese American Community.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Caregiver bereavement outcomes in advanced cancer: associations with quality of death and patient age.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lorraine HoltslanderCollege of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Rm 4216, E-Wing Health Sciences, 104 Clinic Place, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 2Z2, Canada. Lorraine.holtslander@usask.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8641-150X
Sharon BaxterExecutive Director of the Canadian Hospice Palliative Care Association, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Kelly MillsRA; College of Education, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Sarah BockingRA, College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Tina DadgostariRA, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Wendy DugglebyFaculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Vicky DuncanUniversity of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Peter HudsonPalliative Care c/o St. Vincent's Hospital and Collaborative Centre of the University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Agatha OgunkorodeCollege of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
Shelley PeacockCollege of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFamily caregiving in the context of advanced disease in particular, can be physically and emotionally taxing. Caregivers can subsequently face bereavement exhausted with few supports, limited resources and a significant proportion will develop negative psychological and social outcomes. Although some research has attended to the bereavement experiences of family caregivers who had cared for a person requiring palliative care, a comprehensive qualitative understanding of the impact of caregiving on bereavement has not been articulated. The purpose of this study was to conduct a qualitative metasummary to explore the experiences of bereaved family caregivers of people who received palliative care services, regardless of their underlying disease.

methodsSandelowski and Barroso's qualitative metasummary method was utilized: 1287 articles were identified through extensive database searches (i.e. - MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and CINAHL) and reviewed to determine if they fit the criteria. Those included in the review were assessed for study quality. Findings from each study were then thematically coded and a frequency of themes was calculated.

resultsThe sample consisted of 47 qualitative studies. A total of 15 themes emerged. In descending order of frequency, the 15 themes were: the individual emotions of serenity, sadness, guilt, uncertainty, trauma, escape, and anger; post-loss experiences that helped the caregiver in bereavement; post-loss experiences that hindered; practical life changes; caregiver role identity; pre-loss experiences that helped; pre-loss experiences that hindered; caregiver context; and a need for different kinds of supports. Three key findings emerged from the themes: (1) many different aspects of the caregiving experience impact the bereavement experience, (2) every bereavement experience is unique, and (3) a variety of supports must be developed and made available to caregivers to meet these unique needs.

conclusionsBased on the metasummary findings, changes are needed in practice and policy to ensure the health and well-being of the family caregiver is maintained by offering support both during caregiving and bereavement.

Indexed as

BereavementCaregiversFamilyHumansPalliative CareQualitative ResearchSocial SupportBereavementFamily caregiverMetasummaryPalliative careQualitativeSupport

Identifiers

PMID28877699
PMCPMC5585890

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.