ArticleBiophysical journal2017
Acceleration Strategies to Enhance Metabolic Ensemble Modeling Performance.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Understanding biochemical design principles with ensembles of canonical non-linear models.PloS one · 2020Article
- Bayesian inference of metabolic kinetics from genome-scale multiomics data.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Metabolic kinetic modeling provides insight into complex biological questions, but hurdles remain.Current opinion in biotechnology · 2019Review
- From Escherichia coli mutant 13C labeling data to a core kinetic model: A kinetic model parameterization pipeline.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- Approaches to Computational Strain Design in the Multiomics Era.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developing reliable, predictive kinetic models of metabolism is a difficult, yet necessary, priority toward understanding and deliberately altering cellular behavior. Constraint-based modeling has enabled the fields of metabolic engineering and systems biology to make great strides in interrogating cellular metabolism but does not provide sufficient insight into regulation or kinetic limitations of metabolic pathways. Moreover, the growth-optimized assumptions that constraint-based models often rely on do not hold when studying stationary or persistor cell populations. However, developing kinetic models provides many unique challenges, as many of the kinetic parameters and rate laws governing individual enzymes are unknown. Ensemble modeling (EM) was developed to circumnavigate this challenge and effectively sample the large kinetic parameter solution space using consistent experimental datasets. Unfortunately, EM, in its base form, requires long solve times to complete and often leads to unstable kinetic model predictions. Furthermore, these limitations scale prohibitively with increasing model size. As larger metabolic models are developed with increasing genetic information and experimental validation, the demand to incorporate kinetic information increases. Therefore, in this work, we have begun to tackle the challenges of EM by introducing additional steps to the existing method framework specifically through reducing computation time and optimizing parameter sampling. We first reduce the structural complexity of the network by removing dependent species, and second, we sample locally stable parameter sets to reflect realistic biological states of cells. Lastly, we presort the screening data to eliminate the most incorrect predictions in the earliest screening stages, saving further calculations in later stages. Our complementary improvements to this EM framework are easily incorporated into concurrent EM efforts and broaden the application opportunities and accessibility of kinetic modeling across the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.