Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28877221›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Short-term spheroid culture of primary colorectal cancer cells as an in vitro model for personalizing cancer medicine.

Maria Jeppesen, Grith Hagel, Anders Glenthoj, Ben Vainer, Per Ibsen, Henrik Harling, Ole Thastrup, Lars N Jørgensen, Jacob Thastrup

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluating temozolomide for pediatric adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas using microspheroid-based drug screening.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Frontiers in genetics · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Spheroids and organoids derived from colorectal cancer as tools forExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Addressing Key Questions in Organoid Models: Who, Where, How, and Why?International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Maria JeppesenDigestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Grith Hagel2cureX, Birkerød, Denmark.
Anders GlenthojDepartment of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ben VainerDepartment of Pathology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per IbsenDepartment of Pathology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik HarlingDigestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ole Thastrup2cureX, Birkerød, Denmark.
Lars N JørgensenDigestive Disease Center, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacob Thastrup2cureX, Birkerød, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7264-103X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemotherapy treatment of cancer remains a challenge due to the molecular and functional heterogeneity displayed by tumours originating from the same cell type. The pronounced heterogeneity makes it difficult for oncologists to devise an effective therapeutic strategy for the patient. One approach for increasing treatment efficacy is to test the chemosensitivity of cancer cells obtained from the patient's tumour. 3D culture represents a promising method for modelling patient tumours in vitro. The aim of this study was therefore to evaluate how closely short-term spheroid cultures of primary colorectal cancer cells resemble the original tumour. Colorectal cancer cells were isolated from human tumour tissue and cultured as spheroids. Spheroid cultures were established with a high success rate and remained viable for at least 10 days. The spheroids exhibited significant growth over a period of 7 days and no difference in growth rate was observed for spheroids of different sizes. Comparison of spheroids with the original tumour revealed that spheroid culture generally preserved adenocarcinoma histology and expression patterns of cytokeratin 20 and carcinoembryonic antigen. Interestingly, spheroids had a tendency to resemble tumour protein expression more closely after 10 days of culture compared to 3 days. Chemosensitivity screening using spheroids from five patients demonstrated individual response profiles. This indicates that the spheroids maintained patient-to-patient differences in sensitivity towards the drugs and combinations most commonly used for treatment of colorectal cancer. In summary, short-term spheroid culture of primary colorectal adenocarcinoma cells represents a promising in vitro model for use in personalized medicine.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalPrecision MedicineAdenocarcinomaCell ProliferationCell SurvivalColorectal NeoplasmsEpithelial CellsFibroblastsHumansKeratin-20Neoplasm ProteinsSpheroids, CellularTumor Cells, CulturedKeratin-20Neoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28877221
PMCPMC5587104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.