Trial reportThe New England journal of medicine2017
Tezepelumab in Adults with Uncontrolled Asthma.
Trial report in The New England journal of medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 421 papers, 17 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2 Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI9929 in Adult Subjects With Inadequately Controlled, Severe Asthma
Moving Towards PREcision Medicine In United Airways Disease: Unraveling inflaMmatory Patterns in Asthmatic Patients With or Without Nasal Polyps (PREMIUM) - a Descriptive Pilot Study
Potency of HDM Sublingual AIT Tablets in Assuring the Persistency of Asthma Control in HDM Allergic Patients With Severe Asthma, Treated With Tezepelumab
Who cites it
421 citing papers in PubMed, 17 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Symptom burden to characterise, predict, and prevent asthma attacks: a patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials and translational prospective studies.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of Sex on Prediction of Asthma Attacks by Clinical Risk Factors and Type 2 Biomarkers.Chest · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy of biologic agents in patients with comorbid asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2026Pooled it
- Predictors of Response to Biologics for Severe Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Allergy · 2026Pooled it
- Sex-biased Gene Expression Underlies Immune Dysfunction in Asthma.American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology · 2025Pooled it
- Inflammatory and clinical risk factors for asthma attacks (ORACLE2): a patient-level meta-analysis of control groups of 22 randomised trials.The Lancet. Respiratory medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Efficacy of Biologics in Reducing Exacerbations Requiring Hospitalization or an Emergency Department Visit in Patients with Moderate or Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma.Advances in therapy · 2025Pooled it
- The clinical and pathological histology efficacy of biological therapy for severe asthma with a phenotype of type 2 inflammation - systematic review.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Biologic agents licensed for severe asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024Pooled it
- Revised ISHAM-ABPA working group clinical practice guidelines for diagnosing, classifying and treating allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis/mycoses.The European respiratory journal · 2024Guideline
- Efficacy of Biologics in Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma Stratified by Blood Eosinophil Count: A Systematic Review.Advances in therapy · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of Tezepelumab on Quality of Life of Patients with Moderate-to-Severe, Uncontrolled Asthma: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2023Pooled it
- Incidence of Anti-Drug Antibodies to Monoclonal Antibodies in Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2023Pooled it
- Comparative efficacy of tezepelumab to mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in eosinophilic asthma: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology · 2023Pooled it
- The clinical efficacy of type 2 monoclonal antibodies in eosinophil-associated chronic airway diseases: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of tezepelumab vs. placebo in adult patients with severe uncontrolled asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Scientific reports · 2022Pooled it
- The Clinical Efficacy of Type 2 Inflammation-Specific Agents Targeting Interleukins in Reducing Exacerbations in Severe Asthma: A Meta-Analysis.Yonsei medical journal · 2022Pooled it
- Tezepelumab in real-world US patients with severe asthma across phenotypes and underrepresented populations: the phase 4 PASSAGE study.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2026Trial
- Verekitug, a Novel Antibody Antagonist to the TSLP Receptor in Adults with Asthma: A 32-Week Randomized Phase 1b Multiple Ascending-Dose Trial.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2026Trial
- Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of HBM9378 (SKB378/WIN378), a Fully Human IgG1 Monoclonal Antibody Against TSLP After Single Ascending Doses in Chinese Healthy Subjects.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
361 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn some patients with moderate-to-severe asthma, particularly those with noneosinophilic inflammation, the disease remains uncontrolled. This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of tezepelumab (AMG 157/MEDI9929), a human monoclonal antibody specific for the epithelial-cell-derived cytokine thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP), in patients whose asthma remained uncontrolled despite treatment with long-acting beta-agonists and medium-to-high doses of inhaled glucocorticoids.
methodsIn this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we compared subcutaneous tezepelumab at three dose levels with placebo over a 52-week treatment period. The primary end point was the annualized rate of asthma exacerbations (events per patient-year) at week 52.
resultsThe use of tezepelumab at a dose of 70 mg every 4 weeks (low dose; 145 patients), 210 mg every 4 weeks (medium dose; 145 patients), or 280 mg every 2 weeks (high dose; 146 patients) resulted in annualized asthma exacerbation rates at week 52 of 0.26, 0.19, and 0.22, respectively, as compared with 0.67 in the placebo group (148 patients). Thus, exacerbation rates in the respective tezepelumab groups were lower by 61%, 71%, and 66% than the rate in the placebo group (P<0.001 for all comparisons). Similar results were observed in patients regardless of blood eosinophil counts at enrollment. The prebronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 second at week 52 was higher in all tezepelumab groups than in the placebo group (difference, 0.12 liters with the low dose [P=0.01], 0.11 liters with the medium dose [P=0.02], and 0.15 liters with the high dose [P=0.002]). A total of 2 patients in the medium-dose group, 3 in the high-dose group, and 1 in the placebo group discontinued the trial regimen because of adverse events.
conclusionsAmong patients treated with long-acting beta-agonists and medium-to-high doses of inhaled glucocorticoids, those who received tezepelumab had lower rates of clinically significant asthma exacerbations than those who received placebo, independent of baseline blood eosinophil counts. (Funded by MedImmune [a member of the AstraZeneca Group] and Amgen; PATHWAY ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02054130 .).
Indexed as
Identifiers
28877011What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.