Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28876372›Full record

SynthesisArquivos brasileiros de cardiologia2017

Functional Capacity in Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Camila Wohlgemuth Schaan, Aline Chagastelles Pinto de Macedo, Graciele Sbruzzi, Daniel Umpierre, Beatriz D Schaan, Lucia Campos Pellanda

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06448520 (Reference Values for the Muscle Power Sprint Test in Children Aged 5-12 Years), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06448520 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Reference Values for the Muscle Power Sprint Test in Children Aged 5-12 Years

TypeinterventionalSponsorErasmus Medical CenterRan2024 to 2025Enrolled480ConditionsDevelopment, Child, Activity, MotorArmsMuscle Power Sprint Test
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Camila Wohlgemuth SchaanInstituto de Cardiologia, Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Aline Chagastelles Pinto de MacedoInstituto de Cardiologia, Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Graciele SbruzziHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Daniel UmpierreHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Beatriz D SchaanHospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Lucia Campos PellandaInstituto de Cardiologia, Fundação Universitária de Cardiologia, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChildren and adolescents with congenital heart disease often have alterations in their exercise capacity that can be evaluated by various functional testing.

objectiveTo evaluate the functional capacity of children and adolescents with congenital heart disease (CHD) with systematic review and meta-analyses.

methodsThe review included observational studies, data from the first evaluation of randomized clinical trials or observational follow-up periods after clinical trials which evaluated functional capacity by cardiopulmonary exercise test, stress testing, six-minute walk test or step test, in children and adolescents with CHD, aged between six and 18 years, and comparisons with healthy controls in the same age group. The quantitative assessment was performed by meta-analysis, by comparing the maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) of children and adolescents with CHD and respective control groups.

resultsTwenty-five of 2.683 studies identified in the search met the inclusion criteria. The VO2max measurement showed that patients with CHD have a decrease of 9.31 ml/Kg/min (95% CI. -12.48 to -6.13; I2, 94.3%, P for heterogeneity < 0.001) compared with the control group. The meta-analysis of the data of maximum heart rate (HR) reached during cardiopulmonary test and stress testing, retrieved from 18 studies, showed a HR value of -15.14 bpm (95% CI. -20.97 to -9.31; I2, 94.3%, P for heterogeneity < 0.001) compared with the control group.

conclusionChildren and adolescents with CHD have lower VO2max and HR compared to controls.

Indexed as

Exercise TestAdolescentChildExerciseExercise ToleranceHeart Defects, CongenitalHeart RateHumansOxygen Consumption

Identifiers

PMID28876372
PMCPMC5644216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.