Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28875768›Full record

ArticleThe journal of spinal cord medicine2017

Measuring balance confidence after spinal cord injury: the reliability and validity of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale.

Garima Shah, Alison R Oates, Tarun Arora, Joel L Lanovaz, Kristin E Musselman

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of spinal cord medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Garima Shaha SCI Mobility Lab , Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network , Toronto , ON.
Alison R Oatesb College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon , SK.
Tarun Arorac Faculty of Medicine , University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon , SK.
Joel L Lanovazb College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan , Saskatoon , SK.
Kristin E Musselmana SCI Mobility Lab , Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-University Health Network , Toronto , ON.
University of Saskatchewan · CAToronto Rehabilitation Institute · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CONTEXT/

objectiveThe study objectives were to evaluate the test-retest reliability, convergent validity, and discriminative validity of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) scale in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI).

designProspective, cross-sectional study.

settingLaboratory.

participantsTwenty-six community-dwelling individuals with chronic iSCI (20 males, 59.7 + 18.9 years old) and 26 age- and sex-matched able-bodied (AB) individuals participated.

interventionsNone. OUTCOME MEASURES: Measures of balance and gait were collected over two days. Clinical measures included the ABC scale, Mini-Balance Evaluation System's Test, 10-meter Walk Test, SCI Functional Ambulation Profile, manual muscle testing of lower extremity muscles, and measures of lower extremity proprioception and cutaneous pressure sensitivity. Biomechanical measures included the velocity and sway area of centre of pressure (COP) movement during quiet standing.

resultsThe ABC scale demonstrated high test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.93) among participants with iSCI. The minimal detectable change was 14.87%. ABC scale scores correlated with performance on all clinical measures (ρ=0.60-0.80, P<0.01), with the exception of proprioception and cutaneous pressure sensitivity (P=0.20-0.70), demonstrating convergent validity. ABC scale scores also correlated with overall COP velocity (ρ=-0.69, P<0.001) and COP velocity in the anterior-posterior direction (ρ=-0.71, P<0.001). Participants with iSCI scored significantly lower on the ABC scale than the AB participants (P<0.001), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.95, demonstrating discriminative validity.

conclusionThe ABC scale is a reliable and valid measure of balance confidence in community-dwelling, ambulatory individuals with chronic iSCI.

Indexed as

FearPostural BalanceAccidental FallsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SkeletalNeurologic ExaminationProprioceptionReproducibility of ResultsSpinal Cord InjuriesSurveys and QuestionnairesSpinal cord injuries, Balance confidence, Validity, Reliability

Identifiers

PMID28875768
PMCPMC5778940
OpenAlexW2751050155

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.