Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28875724›Full record

ReviewJournal of diabetes science and technology2018

The Long and Winding Road Toward Personalized Glycemic Control in the Critically Ill.

James Stephen Krinsley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Glucose Management Technologies for the Critically Ill.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2019
    Review
  4. Patient Diversity Is Our Reality: the Covariates Matter.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

James Stephen Krinsley1 Stamford Hospital, Department of Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, Stamford, CT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperglycemia is very common in critically ill patients and interventional studies of intensive insulin therapy with the goal of returning ICU glycemia to normal levels have demonstrated mixed results. A large body of literature has demonstrated that diabetes, per se, is not independently associated with increased risk of mortality in this population and that the relationship of glucose metrics to mortality is different for patients with and without diabetes. Moreover, these relationships are confounded by preadmission glycemia; in this regard, patients with diabetes and good preadmission glucose control, as reflected by HbA1c levels obtained at the time of ICU admission, are similar to patients without diabetes. These data point the way toward an era when blood glucose targets in the ICU will be "personalized," based on assessment of preadmission glycemia.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessBlood GlucoseHumansHyperglycemiaIntensive Care UnitsBlood Glucoseblood glucose targetdiabeteshyperglycemiaintensive care unitmortalitypersonalized glucose control

Identifiers

PMID28875724
PMCPMC5761984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.