Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28875457›Full record

ArticleThe patient2018

Patient Satisfaction with Care After Coronary Revascularization.

Danielle L Mosby, Matthew J Manierre, Steve S Martin, Paul Kolm, A Sami Abuzaid, Claudine T Jurkovitz, Daniel J Elliott, William S Weintraub

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The patient, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 80% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Danielle L MosbyNational Center for Human Factors in Healthcare, Washington, DC, USA. Danielle.L.Mosby@medstar.net.
Matthew J ManierreClarkson University, Potsdam, NY, USA.
Steve S MartinUniversity of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Paul KolmValue Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA.
A Sami AbuzaidCardiology, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, Delaware, USA.
Claudine T JurkovitzValue Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA.
Daniel J ElliottChristiana Care Quality Partners, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA.
William S WeintraubValue Institute, Christiana Care Health System, Newark, DE, USA.
Christiana Care Health System · USClarkson University · USThomas Jefferson University · USUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

Subproject Title: Clinical Research Education, Mentoring and Career Development CoreU54GM104941 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI Gregory E Hicks · 2013 to 2026
$60.5M
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services CMS331027-01National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health U54-GM104941NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104941
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBridging the Divides (Bridges), a Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services-funded program, developed a post-hospitalization care management infrastructure integrating information technology-enabled informatics with patient care for ischemic heart disease patients. The objective of this study was to assess patient satisfaction with the Bridges program and determine the patient characteristics associated with higher satisfaction.

methodsAll adult English-speaking patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction and agreed to participate in the Bridges program were eligible. A survey instrument was administered to address patient satisfaction of care received, aspects of care that patients appreciated, and challenges faced. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and primary analyses included comparisons of overall patient satisfaction after discharge between procedure type, and according to age, sex, race, Elixhauser comorbidity count, and length of stay.

resultsFour hundred and sixty-seven (46%) had complete or partial response rates. There was a statistically significant difference in the overall satisfaction among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass grafting, or catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction (p = 0.023). There were significant procedure by sex (p = 0.052) and procedure by age (p = 0.039) interactions. There were no statistically significant differences in overall satisfaction according to age, sex, race, comorbidity count, or length of stay.

conclusionsThis study identified several important components related to patient satisfaction for patients with ischemic heart disease. Results found that patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting were reportedly "very satisfied" when compared with patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and catheterization plus acute myocardial infarction, as well as significant age and sex interactions between procedures.

Indexed as

Patient SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsContinuity of Patient CareFemaleHealth StatusHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial InfarctionMyocardial RevascularizationPatient DischargeRacial Groups

Identifiers

PMID28875457
OpenAlexW2752731724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.