ArticleThe AAPS journal2017
Determination of Critical Quality Attributes for a Biotherapeutic in the QbD Paradigm: GCSF as a Case Study.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- LC-MS Characterization and Stability Assessment Elucidate Correlation Between Charge Variant Composition and Degradation of Monoclonal Antibody Therapeutics.The AAPS journal · 2024Article
- LC-MS based case-by-case analysis of the impact of acidic and basic charge variants of bevacizumab on stability and biological activity.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Understanding Oxidation Propensity in GCSF and Assessment of its Safety and Efficacy.Pharmaceutical research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estimating impact of the various product-related variants and impurities on a biotherapeutic's safety and efficacy is an essential requirement in the quality by design paradigm. In view of the limited role that clinical studies offer in this regard, we demonstrate a preclinical approach to achieve this for granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GCSF). While our repeated-dose toxicity data suggest that these variants do not elicit any adverse effects or histopathological changes, aggregated GCSF impurity caused sluggishness in animal behavior manifested by a possible muscular injury. Cell assay data revealed that the cys-64-cys74 disulfide bond in reduced GCSF imparts stabilization in absence of the cys-36-cys42 bond. PK data demonstrate variability in half lives of different species when compared to the native GCSF. PD data along with differential expression of JAK-2 and STAT5a genes show that all the tested variants triggered the required signal transduction pathways for neutrophil proliferation and activation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.