Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28875290›Full record

ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2018

Evaluation of [

Gezim Bala, Henri Baudhuin, Isabel Remory, Kris Gillis, Pieterjan Debie, Ahmet Krasniqi, Tony Lahoutte, Geert Raes, Nick Devoogdt, Bernard Cosyns and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. CD93 in macrophages: A novel target for atherosclerotic plaque imaging?Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2022
    Article
  7. Re-engineered imaging agent using biomimetic approaches.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Nanobodies asRSC chemical biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Nanobodies as non-invasive imaging tools.Immuno-oncology technology · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Antibody-Based Tracers for PET/SPECT Imaging of Chronic Inflammatory Diseases.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2019
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Imaging Macrophage-associated Inflammation.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Gezim BalaIn Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging (ICMI/BEFY), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7613-0712
Henri BaudhuinIn Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging (ICMI/BEFY), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Isabel RemoryIn Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging (ICMI/BEFY), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Kris GillisIn Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging (ICMI/BEFY), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Pieterjan DebieIn Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging (ICMI/BEFY), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Ahmet KrasniqiIn Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging (ICMI/BEFY), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Tony LahoutteIn Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging (ICMI/BEFY), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Geert RaesLaboratory of Cellular and Molecular Immunology (CMIM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Nick DevoogdtIn Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging (ICMI/BEFY), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Bernard CosynsIn Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging (ICMI/BEFY), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Sophie HernotIn Vivo Cellular and Molecular Imaging (ICMI/BEFY), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium. sophie.hernot@gmail.com.
Vrije Universiteit Brussel · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMacrophage accumulation characterizes the development of atherosclerotic plaques, and the presence of certain macrophage subsets might be an indicator of plaque phenotype and (in)stability. The macrophage mannose receptor (MMR) is expressed on alternatively activated macrophages and found at sites of intraplaque hemorrhage and neovascularization. It has been proposed as target to identify vulnerable plaques. Therefore, we aimed to assess the feasibility of using anti-MMR nanobodies (Nbs) as molecular tracers for nuclear imaging in an animal model of atherosclerosis. PROCEDURE: Anti-MMR and control Nb, radiolabeled with Tc-99m, were injected in ApoE

resultsSignificantly higher uptake was observed in all aortic segments of ApoE

conclusionsNo significant uptake of MMR-specific Nb could be observed in atherosclerotic lesions of ApoE

Indexed as

AnimalsAortaAutoradiographyFemaleHumansLectins, C-TypeMacrophagesMannose-Binding LectinsMannose ReceptorMice, Inbred C57BLPlaque, AtheroscleroticRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, Cell SurfaceSingle-Domain AntibodiesStaining and LabelingTechnetiumLectins, C-TypeMannose-Binding LectinsMannose ReceptorRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, Cell SurfaceSingle-Domain AntibodiesTechnetiumAtherosclerosisMacrophage mannose receptorMolecular imagingNanobody

Identifiers

PMID28875290
OpenAlexW2752741458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.