Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28875032›Full record

ArticleIUCrJ2017

Healing X-ray scattering images.

Jiliang Liu, Julien Lhermitte, Ye Tian, Zheng Zhang, Dantong Yu, Kevin G Yager

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IUCrJ, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Autonomous Small-Angle Scattering for Accelerated Soft Material Formulation Optimization.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. DLSIA: Deep Learning for Scientific Image Analysis.Journal of applied crystallography · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jiliang LiuCenter for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3491-3452
Julien LhermitteCenter for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0660-975X
Ye TianCenter for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA.
Zheng ZhangCenter for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA.
Dantong YuComputational Science Initiative, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA.
Kevin G YagerCenter for Functional Nanomaterials, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA.
Brookhaven National Laboratory · USNew Jersey Institute of Technology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

X-ray scattering images contain numerous gaps and defects arising from detector limitations and experimental configuration. We present a method to heal X-ray scattering images, filling gaps in the data and removing defects in a physically meaningful manner. Unlike generic inpainting methods, this method is closely tuned to the expected structure of reciprocal-space data. In particular, we exploit statistical tests and symmetry analysis to identify the structure of an image; we then copy, average and interpolate measured data into gaps in a way that respects the identified structure and symmetry. Importantly, the underlying analysis methods provide useful characterization of structures present in the image, including the identification of diffuse

Indexed as

data completionimage healinginpaintingSAXSX-ray scattering

Identifiers

PMID28875032
PMCPMC5571808
OpenAlexW2616923947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.