Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28874952›Full record

Observational studyThe western journal of emergency medicine2017

Duration of Mechanical Ventilation in the Emergency Department.

Lauren B Angotti, Jeremy B Richards, Daniel F Fisher, Jeffrey D Sankoff, Todd A Seigel, Haitham S Al Ashry, Susan R Wilcox

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in The western journal of emergency medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06157073 (A Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fully Automated Closed-loop Ventilator Versus Conventional Open-loop Ventilator in Ventilated Patients in the Emergency Department), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06157073 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized, Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Fully Automated Closed-loop Ventilator Versus Conventional Open-loop Ventilator in Ventilated Patients in the Emergency Department

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MalayaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled132ConditionsVentilator Lung, Mechanical Ventilation Complication, Ventilator-Induced Lung Injury, ARDSArmsClosed-loop ventilator, Open-loop ventilator
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Management of Mechanical Ventilation in Emergency Medicine: A Scoping Review.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Review
  8. Post-intubation sedation in the emergency department: A scoping review.The American journal of emergency medicine · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Boarding of critically Ill patients in the emergency department.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Observational
  17. Invasive mechanical ventilation in the emergency department.Turkish journal of emergency medicine · 2019
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren B AngottiMedical University of South Carolina, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Charleston, South Carolina.
Jeremy B RichardsMedical University of South Carolina, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Charleston, South Carolina.
Daniel F FisherMassachusetts General Hospital, Respiratory Care Services, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jeffrey D SankoffUniversity of Colorado at Denver, School of Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Denver, Colorado.
Todd A SeigelKaiser Permanente East Bay, Oakland and Richmond Medical Centers, Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Oakland, California.
Haitham S Al AshryMedical University of South Carolina, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Charleston, South Carolina.
Susan R WilcoxMedical University of South Carolina, Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Charleston, South Carolina.
Kaiser Permanente · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USMassachusetts General Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDue to hospital crowding, mechanically ventilated patients are increasingly spending hours boarding in emergency departments (ED) before intensive care unit (ICU) admission. This study aims to evaluate the association between time ventilated in the ED and in-hospital mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS).

methodsThis was a multi-center, prospective, observational study of patients ventilated in the ED, conducted at three academic Level I Trauma Centers from July 2011 to March 2013. All consecutive adult patients on invasive mechanical ventilation were eligible for enrollment. We performed a Cox regression to assess for a mortality effect for mechanically ventilated patients with each hour of increasing LOS in the ED and multivariable regression analyses to assess for independently significant contributors to in-hospital mortality. Our primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, with secondary outcomes of ventilator days, ICU LOS and hospital LOS. We further commented on use of lung protective ventilation and frequency of ventilator changes made in this cohort.

resultsWe enrolled 535 patients, of whom 525 met all inclusion criteria. Altered mental status without respiratory pathology was the most common reason for intubation, followed by trauma and respiratory failure. Using iterated Cox regression, a mortality effect occurred at ED time of mechanical ventilation > 7 hours, and the longer ED stay was also associated with a longer total duration of intubation. However, adjusted multivariable regression analysis demonstrated only older age and admission to the neurosciences ICU as independently associated with increased mortality. Of interest, only 23.8% of patients ventilated in the ED for over seven hours had changes made to their ventilator.

conclusionIn a prospective observational study of patients mechanically ventilated in the ED, there was a significant mortality benefit to expedited transfer of patients into an appropriate ICU setting.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospital MortalityHumansIntensive Care UnitsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedPatient TransferProspective StudiesRespiration, ArtificialTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID28874952
PMCPMC5576636
OpenAlexW2734573431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.